so...what was it?
-
-
Replying to @i_contemplate_
accidentally didn't merge in something in a completely different part of the program that typed certain numerics as int64s
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @alicemazzy
Oooooh yeah, that’ll do it, PG misses indexes if you type the bind wrong
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @the_quark
the column actually is numeric, and it explains the same either way, it's probably some weird bug in dbdpg
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @alicemazzy
Sorry, PG in cahoots with DBD::Pg. No idea who is at fault.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @the_quark
I figured it out, they convert SQL_NUMERIC to PG_FLOAT
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @alicemazzy @the_quark
...I say, while screaming
3:56 PM - 22 Feb 2017
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.