the problem with the far right mobilizing people to their cause is if they continue to cut public services, people will not follow them
union heads seem to like him. the rhetoric about large-scale infrastructure buildout if followed through on could be the thing
-
-
i don't see this happening esp because so many in his cabinet are businessmen and CEOs and don't think this way
-
s'a lot harder to make the case that you should invest to provide basic services to people who care about primarily about profit
-
I guess this is something I can't grasp, though I know it's true, why anyone would want to amass money and influence and want...
-
...nothing more from it than more money. if/when I get there, I'd want to *do* something with it
-
i think that's the appeal of Silicon Valley. but even Silicon Valley uses that visionary stuff as a mask for the more mundane
-
i think it's just the world we live in? i'm an artist because it's an easier space to envision an entirely different reality
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
if not mired in corruption anyway, which is somewhat dubious given his track record, but I doubt he's really in charge
-
even better than jobs, it's a powerful narrative. "we're rebuilding america". that'd be the way to go, anyway
-
this is what the commentariat misses when they boggle about "voting against their economic interests". most people want purpose
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.