"not doing it for the same reason" it was done for *exactly* the same reason: imposition of a culture on a subject population
-
-
Replying to @alicemazzy @ClarkHat
the merits of the thing in itself are entirely separable, the *methods* of forcing adherence work for arbitrary world-systems
1 reply 0 retweets 13 likes -
Replying to @alicemazzy @ClarkHat
most progs aren't sufficiently self-critical/detached enough to even have this conversation but: separate the enforcement...
2 replies 1 retweet 12 likes -
Replying to @alicemazzy @ClarkHat
...mechanism and debate the merits of the culture itself to determine whether it is worth forcing on a population
2 replies 0 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @alicemazzy @ClarkHat
I see a split between two ways of interpreting the world, content-based and process-based
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
content-based is "x opinion is unacceptable" and process-based is "treat all opinions the same"
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
it sounds facile but that way, but I really think that leads to factions arguing around each other
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @sonyaellenmann @ClarkHat
this sounds like universalism vs relativism to me, and tbh I disagree with both
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @sonyaellenmann @ClarkHat
I don't think there's an objective basis, but I also don't think that means they're all equally valid or true
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
you can define metrics and compare cultures against each other, and some are overall better than others
-
-
Replying to @alicemazzy @ClarkHat
wouldn't that be a process-based approach? "we choose these metrics and judge all accordingly"
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.