I get the impression LLVM is also approaching some limit where nobody can work on it without breaking shit.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
gcc vs llvm/clang is like watching microsoft vs the world. You know how it's going to end, but it's still an entertaining show
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
gcc supports more old architectures. But if you want to make a new one now … LLVM is easier and good enough.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
and that's *after* the massive fork/cleanup/rewrite in the early 2000s. But it still beats LLVM by a few percent, mostly. Close.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
with -OO, it still takes about 50 options to turn off optimizations that cause incorrect asm generation in the presence of bugs.
-
once you do though, I've seen some very nasty bugs people have spent weeks on get solved in minutes. Highly recommended.
-
*for debug builds.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
That's Theo De Raadt, and that is the cat-v page on gcc, IIRC.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.