Yes, not opposing subjugation and quietly assimilating is definitely what has defeated oppression in the past.
-
-
Again I ask: who is it historically who has actually worried about miscegenation?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HarryGiles @ClarkHat
I am arguing that is beside the point. the white supremacists of old were roundly rejected in the 60s
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
if there is a resurgence, it won't be KKK and neo-nazis, it will be following the pattern laid by the left
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
you see this with the identitarians in europe, they're just doing the exact same thing as progs
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
and fwiw assimilation has worked marvelously for the gays. the liberal order is the best anti-tribal framework...
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
...we've yet made ("liberal" in the 1848 sense). but it is probably doomed and I'm not sure what can replace it
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
but I would argue very strongly that something *needs* to replace it, fostering all vs all is a road to ruin
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Alice Maz Retweeted Harry Josephine
also https://twitter.com/HarryGiles/status/798213182892478464 … I mean, you've read your foucault, gay identity was created by pathologization of sodomy
Alice Maz added,
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
time and again mainstream hammers away at "you are X and X is bad!!" backlash results, "damn right I'm X! X is good!!"
3 replies 3 retweets 10 likes
I am heavily, heavily in favor of "lol no one cares if you're X"
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.