also discovered for reasons I have yet to investigate the sha1 impl I wrote produces incorrect outputs... when input is exactly 55 bytes
ya, not at computer atm but 55 + 8 for length + 1 = 64, I'd guess I'm padding more when I shouldn't be
-
-
since I did the lazy thing and appended 0x80 rather than going to bit granularity
-
I think most implementations do that, which is fine as long as you're only hashing complete bytes; but the +1 is tricky
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.