He articulated it perfectly.https://twitter.com/mountain_ghosts/status/1238759431120269314 …
Where is the math? Where are the studies? They are taking a risk - for what? What is the worst case scenario under this strategy? I am not a fan of post-hoc rationalisation - "they are doing this hence they must have good reasons to believe it will work".
-
-
They are gambling with the health of millions of people and showing little to nothing when it comes to the factual basis of their reasoning. No surprise that many, myself included, believe this to be a value judgement - what they deem worth sacrificing to avoid economic impact.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Maths? Studies? There is plenty of maths on disease spread (you know that). Including in areas of immunity, reinfection rates etc. They haven't made it public which they could easily have reasons for but there is plenty of research in these fields.

-
Of course there is tons of math and studies in epidemiology. The same all other governments across the globe are using to determine their policies. If you are going in the opposite direction of everybody else you might want to show more instead of simply "UK knows better".
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
Writing about stuff to learn how it works, mostly in Rust.
Lead Engineer at