Is this an intentional (sinister) double entendre?
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ideally, sure, the idea is warm/fuzzy. Practically, though: If necessary, barely sentient beings left behind, If uplifting them would severely damper the ability to uplift or get bliss to much more sentient beings. Humans will not put their children in line after the earthworms.
-
Do you mean by 'much more sentient': 'with a greater hedonic/doloric range'? Which beings do you think are capable of stronger valenced* qualia, and why? *hedonic valence: how good or bad some qualia feels.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.