Alex StamosOvjeren akaunt

@alexstamos

Recovering CISO teaching and researching safe tech at the Stanford Internet Observatory. “Less diplomatic on Twitter...” - DigiDay

San Francisco, CA
Vrijeme pridruživanja: svibanj 2009.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @alexstamos

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @alexstamos

  1. Prikvačeni tweet
    15. sij

    1) Don't use a hashtag to criticize that hashtag. 2) Stop quote-tweeting small-follower accounts as criticism. 3) Don't believe that the population of "people" on Twitter is reflective of anything, including "candidate X's followers".

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  2. Unfortunately the stream is occasionally unusable, gotta fall back to ’s crappy but predictable 720p.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  3. A big experiment by as they try to stream the in 4K for the first time. The stream was nice and stable for much of pre-game but as we get closer to kickoff it looks like the CDN is occasionally choking. Good luck to the relevant ops teams!

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  4. Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  5. 2. velj

    I just realized that the "Is there a sportsball game?!??" and "Superb Owl" posts that prove how independent minded the poster is (in a manner identical to millions of other independent people) will start in a couple of hours and I'm not sure there is enough Xanax in the world.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  6. 1. velj

    Zuck is focused on the free speech rights of individuals. Baquet on the critical role of journalism. Both men are right about the importance of these considerations, but they also need frameworks that take into account that our cherished freedoms are being used against us.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  7. 1. velj

    Another way to sum up: Baquet and Zuckerberg are both focused on the equities surrounding each individual decision on what to publish or moderate without properly considering the big picture of how the information environment is being professionally manipulated.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  8. 1. velj

    Ugh, typos. I guess I need an executive editor.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  9. 1. velj

    cc Something for us to discussion on stage at Michigan!

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  10. 1. velj

    It is unfortunate that the NY Times has not set good standards for the rest of the industry on how to *not* becoming an unwitting part of a foreign influence campaign. Hopefully the does a retrospective with a bit more humility and some concrete recommendations.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  11. 1. velj

    Unfortunately, the podcast doesn't address another disastrous story from the last days of the campaign, where the Times was possibly played by pro-Trump leakers. I can't believe this story still doesn't have an editor's note at the bottom.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  12. 1. velj

    He says that the Times will run with newsworthy leaks without explaining how they could frame said leaks or take into account that a professional intel source would clearly leak a misleading subset. He is telling the IRGC, PLA/MSS and SVR/GRU that the Times is open for business.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  13. 1. velj

    This is where the Baquet/Zuckerberg parallels are strongest. Just as Zuck didn't address amplification, Baquet doesn't seem to recognize that the GRU was able to shape the tone of coverage in the critical final weeks. He equates "newsworthy" with "multiple front pages".

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  14. 1. velj

    Barbaro smartly asks about the Times' articles based upon documents that were hacked and then strategically leaked. Baquet recognizes some mistakes, but basically says that if it is newsworthy (he uses tax returns as an example) then the Times will run with stolen documents.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  15. 1. velj

    I can't find a transcript, but try to find where Baquet jokingly threatens reporters who have questioned his decisions! I'm sorry, but if a tech CEO did that it would be a scandal. Also note how much time he spends justifying decisions instead of on lessons he has learned.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  16. 1. velj

    The full interview with Baquet is worth a listen. The Daily is one of my favorite podcasts, and deserves a lot of credit for asking hard questions of his boss.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  17. 1. velj

    Here is a discussion between and I about Zuck's speech. My big problem was the collapse of different kinds of online platforms into one messy free-speech ball. To me, as amplification increases so does responsibility as privacy rights decrease.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  18. 1. velj

    This interview with the NY Times' executive editor is the establishment media equivalent of Zuckerberg's widely-panned Georgetown speech. Both spend most of their time justifying past decisions while missing the big picture point on how 2016 has shifted the information ecosystem.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  19. 1. velj

    He’s carrying a rifle, but thank you for explaining risk management to me.

    Poništi
  20. 1. velj

    One of the better ideas I have heard of how social media companies can deal with state organs is to ban accounts tied to governments that don't allow free access to said social media site. If normal Chinese citizens can't post to Twitter/FB, the CCP shouldn't either.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  21. 1. velj

    Global Times is a propaganda organ of the Chinese Communist Party. They are using this crisis to sell the world on the benefits of their control of the Chinese people. Americans are amplifying this along with unconfirmed stories of the PRC quickly building hospitals. Don't.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·