Maybe also how he feels about the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence; specifically, its recent review into the evidence for PBs. Would he decline to comment, admitting he’s not an expert? Or would he claim the same level of expertise as the reviewers?
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And do it in a really slow annoying way with lots of affected silence for maximum discomfort.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And continue asking questions until he says what they want him to say.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What a calculated thing to do - invite people onto your podcast and pretend to be interested in their work when your real motive is to interrogate one of them over saying something you didn't like. So disingenuous.
-
Just listened to it there; aside from the fact it was obviously an ambush, it was quite a pathetic line of questioning (he didn't even really have a question), when there might have been an opportunity for a useful conversation.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
God it was such a dick move. Full credit to Robert Webb for neither backing down nor being drawn.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why? Because: a) they aren't experimental and b) they are endorsed by all the relevant medical expert organisationshttps://twitter.com/doublehelix/status/1370704952369221638 …
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.