Good one, Alex. I can’t recall where I read it but the gist was that we’re using the word priority all wrong. We assign several priorities when priority is actually only one thing. That’s why it’s called priority. Does that make sense?
-
-
-
Oh I like this thinking and I fully agree. Second priority just means it’s up next but somehow when saying it it feels wrong. There should be only one. It’s saying yes to one thing and no to the rest. Maybe we can have different priorities in different parts of life though?
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
*if everyone is important, no one is important. Doesn't quite work the same. Of course every one is important! Every. Single. One.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.