Possible that the 'moral' food wasn't chosen at random, but settled on healthier options either through wisdom or natural selection (exaggerated example: some non-Judaic tribe desert tribe advocated eating seafood, died from food poisoning). Doesn't mean research not biased also.
-
-
-
ofc that is possible but maybe the memetic power of non-tasty food is actually the biggest driver. There are plenty of cultural maladaptions
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
(Wow what is wrong with the fonts in your screenshot)
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Yeah, seems like people always think that veganism is either both healthy and a more imperative or unhealthy and morally unnecessary. No one seems to think it’s both unhealthy and morally necessary or the reverse.
-
(If I had to pick, I'd go with 'unhealthy but morally necessary'.)
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Don't think diet is all derangement unless [specific foods/food groups] is what you mean by "diet". Most researchers advocate moderate eating, seems mostly borne out by evidence on how bad obesity is, often advocate against tasty foods, which are +palatable
-
So in some convoluted way, this disgust-driven rejection of tasty foods is sort of right about root cause of overeating, which is hyperpalatable food. If "hungry brain" hypothesis is right
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
There are psychological components to this. “The grass is greener on the other side” encompasses this dynamic with desiring the unattainable or forbidden. The way we desire rarity seems similar. It’s not convincing enough to assume meat is inherently more delicious than veg food.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.