That's not evidence of anything, regards this pandemic.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @DiscePuer @Soulphood and
If you are implying that the Imperial College study that Ferguson co-authored was off in regards to this pandemic, you are incorrect. That study listed several mitigation strategies and scenarios, with a wide range of possible deaths... from 5k-550k (UK).pic.twitter.com/Frwjl7SkLD
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @Sparknottle @DiscePuer and
What are u comparing though, b/c social distancing greatly influences the predicted results, and Sw is not 'doing nothing'. Beyond that, situation is still fluid. Trump was asked about Sw 2 days ago, and he said it was wrong approach for US.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/04/10/asked-about-sweden-trump-undercuts-idea-quickly-reopening-united-states/ …pic.twitter.com/2EIYaTqtVv
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @Sparknottle @DiscePuer and
You didn't answer my q. What figures are u using? How do you know it hasnt? Where's your evi?
Pointless question, IMO.
The IC study explicitly discussed this aspect, and said "suppression carries enormous social/eco costs, which may impact health". No perfect solution.pic.twitter.com/K96A2OSKsD
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
You're really good at not answering questions. And missing who tweets are directed at. And missing sarcasm.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.