True for individuals, but how do you scapegoat a crowd?
-
-
Replying to @alephzadk
Euryalus Retweeted einprozent.de
I think we're about to observe an example of what i mean with these guys:https://twitter.com/ein_prozent/status/811224143505092609 …
Euryalus added,
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @deltakyklos
But if the crowd is large/powerful enough it can't work.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @deltakyklos
if the crowd is large/powerful enough you get another girardian key, la montée aux extrèmes (pardon my french)
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @alephzadk
.@AlephZadik A different game, yes! And Girard would point to Christ as a way to avoid both games altogether.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @alephzadk
.@AlephZadik Girard could be generalized by a new religion, cf. Spandrell's conversion to Kek.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @deltakyklos
imho we don't need a new religion, we need a severe anthropological reassesment
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @alephzadk
Euryalus Retweeted
.@AlephZadik True: not necessary. But sufficient if it achieves awareness of the sacrificial nature of progressivism https://twitter.com/deltakyklos/status/810571520070352900 …
Euryalus added,
This Tweet is unavailable.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @deltakyklos
but not suficient if what you want to achieve is an awareness of your own nature, which is done only by building and acting
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.