What are you talking about, it's people like you that are saying garbage like, "The broken stair is a historical landmark you can't fix it" We want to fix problems, not tolerate them or being forced to incorporate them into our daily lives. The cause is the debate.
-
-
Replying to @MikeWaxonWaxoff @AdityaBhavnani and
Yet the only fix you can offer is more of the same. And that hasn’t been working for decades. Not only that, you actively oppose anything outside of your tiny little box. I understand that change can be intimidating. Try to stop being afraid, you might actually enjoy yourself.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @unbannotcars @kisumxes and
I put operational efficiency above all else. I want self-driving cars to go through intersections at a hundred miles per hour nearly missing each other with perfect timing. You want me to tolerate and spend hundreds of millions on pathways for an invention of the 1800s?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MikeWaxonWaxoff @AdityaBhavnani and
Figures, since you clearly hate cities and the people that live in them. I got bad news for you, that’s not at all what you’ll be getting. Here’s what you should be looking forward to:pic.twitter.com/Fv6eGexV5m
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @unbannotcars @kisumxes and
That looks like where I might want to live, here's the technology I want for my future home.pic.twitter.com/pu3TBn2nGx
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
I'm all for change, but I want it all on the table. None of this BS nickle and diming. "Just this", then "just that" repeat ad nauseum. State completely what you want and have everybody decide is this what we want as an entire CITY to do or not. Then live with the results.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MikeWaxonWaxoff @netfire4 and
What would you like to change? What sort of changes would you agree to?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @albertsonscares @netfire4 and
Mixed topic now. Criminal=max sentance or self selected banishment to live free elsewhere. Transportation=long-term projects, Elevated/underground public transportation. Not wasting on special interests "beauty scapes" Homeless= Multi-County consortium, re-civilization camps
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MikeWaxonWaxoff @netfire4 and
Ok. What would you like to achieve with each of these measures?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @albertsonscares @netfire4 and
1. Remove the social effects of criminals on children & communities. (No recidivism) Outgoing opens spots for legal immigration. 2. Speedy & efficient transportation for all. (like to see less clunky options) 3. Much lower cost, immediate intervention, not allowed to spiral.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
1. any sources on lower recidivism rates? 2. more efficient transportation requires removal of either most SOV traffic or cities. Both do not work in the same place. 3. how? What kind of interventions?
-
-
Replying to @albertsonscares
1. Reassigned to another country, not here to commit crime. 2. Tech designs cities from scratch instead of fleeing to Austin/Miami. (Rail, solar, green, etc) No retrofitting old cities until full proof of concept & acceptance. 3. Drug/mental health intervention in Low cost area
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MikeWaxonWaxoff
1. What about those that opt to stay? And the ones that sneak back in? 2. Abandon all existing cities and relocate millions of people? Who’s paying for that? Proof of concept exists for sustainable cities. They’re all low car or car free. 3. How? Housing first is cheapest.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.