I don't see how ZFS working great for you is a proof that Btrfs couldn't. I've used it in some capacity for almost 10 years, as my roofs and on a home server (RAID5 no less) ran it in RAID2 mode on a previous home server. Corrupted some files once 5+ years ago but had backups.
-
-
-
ZFS was the *default* filesystem on Solaris _over a decade ago_. Just let that sink in for a moment. Where are we at with btrfs as a default?
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Is this stored on ZFS on Linux or OpenSolaris/Illumos/Solaris?
-
illumos/SmartOS, we operate a Joyent Triton based cloud. But we use ZFSOnLinux in various places too, including inside Linux VMs. Separate file systems per website or service + auto snapshots to recover from frequent customer user error = massive win.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Really wish there is a consumer NAS based on FreeBSD and ZFS.
Novi razgovor -
-
-
must let oracle gave the copyright to linux own the zfs
-
I used to disagree because I’m an illumos fanboy, but at this point I think it would be a very good idea.
- Još 2 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Years ago; I decided to try BTRFS; it was supposedly ready for Raid5/6 type usage, kept it up to date. Then had a drive go out "paritally" (lots of read errors). Corrupted lots of files; had to use a backup to recover... 1/2
-
Switched to zfs as part of the recovery. Had the same thing happen, and even though a drive was failing in the same way; ZFS kept chugging along fixing things until I could get a replacement drive. Replacing the drive; not a issue. ZFS = Peace of mind.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.