Opens profile photo
Follow
Anthony Towns
@ajtowns
J Random Hacker
Brisbane, Qld, Australiaerisian.com.au/wordpressJoined January 2009

Anthony Towns’s Tweets

Pinned Tweet
.
Quote Tweet
Greg Maxwell's explanation on why he's not on Twitter goes pretty deep, and makes some good critical points about the pitfalls of (purposefully) limited communication space: old.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comm
Image
Image
Image
Image
12
45
Alternatively you could add a verification step where your nostr message includes an ots proof based on a block where the tx output in question was still unspent. Would need to go further if you wanted to also avoid the possibility of sats being secretly encumbered by some nft.
4
Show this thread
If it was popular it would obviously mean coins would become coloured - a coin that holds some awesome nft is perhaps worth more than another coin of the same value that doesn't. But that's obviously the point of ordinals in the first place.
1
5
Show this thread
It means previous owners of your sat can turn it into an nft that you own without your consent. Perhaps that would be bad somehow? Much cheaper to post a nostr message than a tx though, even at 1sat/vb.
3
7
Show this thread
Your unique nft id is the nostr message id, and to verify it you check the txid exists, and has an output matching the ordinal and pubkey. "Ownership" of the nft then moves with the specified sat. Copying the nostr message to different relays is fine and encouraged.
1
7
Show this thread
Is there anything about ordinal inscriptions that can't just be done via a nostr message with 0 on chain footprint? Choose a sat locked into a taproot, p2wpkh or p2pkh address. Post a nostr message signed by the (internal) pubkey, tagged with the txid and ordinal and inscription.
5
36
Show this thread
What's the point of gigameg blocks if you have to upload a hash of a court order instead of the full pdf?
Quote Tweet
Here’s a high-level summary: - Freeze a transaction by adding it to the blacklist - Create a transaction that spends the frozen inputs, and includes an OP_RETURN that contains a hash (it’s supposed to be the hash of the court order, which is cute and total theater) …
Show this thread
8
Oh hey, guess the current Australian government will also be passing a copyright extension act in the next couple of years to avoid things becoming public domain on 1st Jan 2026.
Quote Tweet
There is no public domain day in Canada this year and thanks to copyright term extension passed by the government in a budget implementation bill in 2022 there will not be one for 20 years. twitter.com/DukeCSPD/statu
Show this thread
1
2
Suffering? I don't care if Monday's blue. Discipline? Tuesday's grey and Wednesday too. Laziness? Thursday, I don't care about you. Happiness? It's Friday, I'm in love. I guess the Cure disagrees about ordering.
Quote Tweet
My (oversimplified) weekly life cycle: Suffering -> Discipline Discipline -> Happiness Happiness -> Laziness Laziness -> Suffering
3
Either that, or it's Elon playing 18 dimensional chess, via a genius plot to show how much better twitter is than the alternatives, resulting in everyone appreciating Elon and twitter even more. After all, that would be the most ironic outcome, which makes it 99.9% certain.
1
Show this thread
Clearly this is the Deep State fighting back. The twitter files were revealing too much, and Elon's distracted by the World Cup final, so the remaining moles that haven't been fired yet are taking the opportunity to sabotage things while they still can.
Quote Tweet
Twitter seemingly banned @paulg for this tweet. A major account that was obviously not "solely created to promote other social media platforms." And he didn't even post the link! As @balajis said, this is a bad policy and should be reversed.
Image
Image
1
6
Show this thread
Suppose your bitcoin node is forwarding someone else's transaction. Would you rather:
  • use ~5% less data
    8.1%
  • help them be more private
    91.9%
149 votesFinal results
5
1
Still amazed that the current crypto world bad guy is a Mr Bankman. The simulation's showrunners are really phoning it in this season.
1
9
What are people's opinion on the Bitcoin Inquisition idea? I.e. to test soft forks on Signet using a separate code base which people can opt into (per soft fork basis). (Comment with details esp. if you are opposed to the idea.)
  • Like it
    44.9%
  • Indifferent
    21.1%
  • Don't like it
    34%
147 votesFinal results
11
5
Wow. This is somehow even worse than you'd expect. Instead of setting up a centralised authority, it's "if miners decide to confiscate anyone's funds, they can". Requires a 50% attack for 6-blocks, but that's cheap on bsv. Get out now.
Quote Tweet
Looks like BSV is (finally) setting up the ability to steal random coins so they can dump them on the market to keep the scam going. Definitely time to get out... github.com/bitcoin-sv/bit
5
38
The 320k ETH was sent on block 15793614 but the snapshot for the proof-of-reserve was taken on block 15778435. Assuming the report is truthful, then the ETH couldn't have been used as a top-up. etherscan.io/tx/0xb426efda7 raw.githubusercontent.com/gateio/proof-o
Quote Tweet
This is getting wild. The time that Crypto .com claims to have "accidently" sent user funds was during the Gate proof-of-reserve. And we just saw similar behavior with Huobi. Are exchanges passing around ETH loans to pass audits?! twitter.com/shegenerates/s…
Show this thread
36
566
The innumeracy of this is truly astounding. SBF didn't understand the geometric mean criterion. I'll throw in that you should bet below kelly, not because it's mathematically optimal but because you're likely underestimating variance/correlation
Quote Tweet
Two years ago SBF wrote a thread on bet size and Kelly betting. I questioned him on it. He engaged with me. Let’s take a look at this thread and SBF’s views on bet sizing in light of the events with FTX and Alameda this week. twitter.com/SBF_FTX/status…
Show this thread
5
100