Studies have shown time and time again that sensation between a circumcised man and uncircumcised are non existence. Even with ones that had sex before their circumcision shows no difference, which kinda detroyes that foreskin gives out a much greater sensation.
No, they did. Saying that circumcision removes the most sensitive part of the penis obviously infers that the penis lost sensitivity. However, as the study I presented showed, this assertion has been debunked multiple times and show the penis not at all losing sensitivity.
-
-
The study you presented mentioned the study I linked in its intro but did not include it as one of the 10 studies used in the meta-analysis (see Table 1). Also, the analysis looked at PE, ED, dyspareunia, orgasm difficulties, and low or lack of sexual desire, but not sensitivity.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

