He has opinions.
-
-
>Study in the fields of anatomy >Actually believing the foreskin have ton of sensation meme Lying won't help your cause.
6 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Studies have shown time and time again that sensation between a circumcised man and uncircumcised are non existence. Even with ones that had sex before their circumcision shows no difference, which kinda detroyes that foreskin gives out a much greater sensation.
10 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aimlesslytrying @dkingpower7 and
Other studies disagree. Really a single counter example is needed, and there are many men who say it's less sensation. What makes more logically sense? Cutting off 10k-20k nerve endings, destroying the mucluos membrane and gliding function decreases sexual pleasure, or not?
2 replies 3 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @TibbitTidbits @dkingpower7 and
Oh, you mean the nerve ending myth that has no actual scientific study, and came from a bad magazine. the gliding function that many uncircumcised men don't even notice or doesn't do it for them, for sexual pleasure that studies shows no difference towards. I guess?
5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aimlesslytrying @TibbitTidbits and
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1046/j.1464-410x.1999.0830s1079.x … Women report more discomfort, less orgasms, more difficulty reaching orgasm, with a circumcised male too. It doesn't just strip us of the most pleasurable part of the penis, but the functions lost, the mechanical gliding causes painful friction and >>pic.twitter.com/qKY1NvCaKu
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ReyosB @aimlesslytrying and
2> the lack of a seal between the man and women causes the coronal ridge of the glans to keep pulling the lubrication back out with every thrust in. Thrusts which tend to be harder and rougher, since the man has to work at it harder to feel any pleasure.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ReyosB @TibbitTidbits and
That study was also heavily criticized for again being methodologically flawed and the author themselves admitting are not conclusive: “it is important that these findings be confirmed by a prospective study of a randomly selected population of women”.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Anther fun tidbit being that almost half of the participants was recruited with anit-circumcision talk: "recruited through … an announcement in an anti-circumcision newsletter”. So not really a good study really and bias. Really?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

