Oh, so is not about consent anymore and more about destruction of a body part. I would laugh how easily you changed the goalpost, but I'm honestly relieved that you jumped ship with that logic. But that body part is virtually useless and barely change anything.
Circumcision risks are very low, with high benefits. Change nothing of tbe sex lives for the males, loses no function, and a safe procedure. So I see no problem in circumcision.
-
-
wow, 5 wrongs in a row.
-
I mean when I present ed with myths that's been debunked by studies, I guess I really don't care.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
High benefits ? If the benefits were as high, doctors would recommend it as much as vaccines but oh wait, they actually don't recommend circumcision as a medically worthy procedure.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
The American Academy of Pediatrics say the benefits are not great enough to recommend it to be done on all new born boys. It comes down to beliefs, religious choices or social constructs (I don't think any of these are good reasons).
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

