So you believe it's numb? And you're going to ignore vaginal dryness due to the lack of glide? There are studies that show there is a difference. It's very hard to get a man to admit his manhood is deficient. At the very least it's causes many men a sense of loss and anger.
Like vaccines, there preventions for a reason. You do it early to prevent those stuff from even forming at all. Since why wait for a problem, when you can eliminate from ever coming up. I'm against hospitals forcing circumcisions on all children. It's a parental decision.
-
-
There's no logic in mutilating someone on the off chance that it might prevent a lesser problem down the road though. Otherwise why not just start lopping off all kinds of "non-essential" bits? Breasts? Might get cancer! Testicles? Torsion can kill! Limbs? Might break a bone!
-
You can't really call STDs lesser problems when it had destroyed lives each year. Even then, all these other parts have irreplaceable biological function, risk would be higher than the benefits, and will worsen quality of life. Foreskin functions makes no actual difference in-
-
-what it supposedly does. Pleasure is the same for cut and interact males, as well as sensitivity. And the glide feature have no unique functions that actually makes any difference. So the foreskin is literally useless.
-
Weird that there's a part of the body that's just totally useless like that. Weird that its analogue on the female body - the clitoral hood - is absolutely full of nerve endings and hurts like a bitch when you cut it off (which is the mildest form of fgm).
-
Many STDs are actually completely cureable in current year, only a few are still really a life-changing problem in the first world where circumcision is prevalent. I'm not as convinced as you are that the foreskin is useless. I bet it's very useful, but as a woman I'll never know
-
I'm not even saying I want to ban the practice for religious reasons, or in case of medical necessity. But enough men say they were harmed by the practice that doing it prophylactically is just unjustifiable imo
-
But that men are using information that's flawed or debunked. I've seen most of my friends barely having a problem being circumcised and other men online seeing no difference. Again, the data shows no difference and these guys are just buying into the fearmongering.
-
I get not wanting to circumcised you son, but acting as if it's the worst thing to happen to him is dishonest. It's up to the parents and until I see actual problems to circumcision, I think it's just a non issue.
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

