Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
aimlesslytrying's profile
Williams✝
Williams✝
Williams ✝
@aimlesslytrying

Tweets

Williams ✝

@aimlesslytrying

A joke on the internet like the rest of ya. Christian and let the Lord be with you. Love others and share no hate, now that's a motto right?🇺🇸🇭🇹

The Sun hate this land.
Joined October 2015

Tweets

  • © 2018 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. Gregory Malchuk‏ @Gregory_Malchuk Oct 6

      HOLY SHIT!!! AT THE SUPREME COURT TODAY!!!pic.twitter.com/pLtfMGhVfQ

      55 replies 274 retweets 985 likes
      Show this thread
    2. Chad Nine‏ @Chad_Nine Oct 7
      Replying to @Gregory_Malchuk

      He has opinions.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    3. Williams ✝‏ @aimlesslytrying Oct 7
      Replying to @dkingpower7 @Chad_Nine @Gregory_Malchuk

      >Study in the fields of anatomy >Actually believing the foreskin have ton of sensation meme Lying won't help your cause.

      6 replies 0 retweets 1 like
      Williams ✝‏ @aimlesslytrying Oct 7
      Replying to @dkingpower7 @Chad_Nine @Gregory_Malchuk

      Studies have shown time and time again that sensation between a circumcised man and uncircumcised are non existence. Even with ones that had sex before their circumcision shows no difference, which kinda detroyes that foreskin gives out a much greater sensation.

      3:15 PM - 7 Oct 2018
      10 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        1. New conversation
        2. Williams ✝‏ @aimlesslytrying Oct 7
          Replying to @dkingpower7 @Chad_Nine @Gregory_Malchuk

          It doesn't matter what parts they don't have, only how pleasureable the sex actually is, which is the heart of this issue. Because it seems weird that the foreskin that all these sensations that would logically make more pleasure sex, yet studies have shown no difference.

          2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        3. Williams ✝‏ @aimlesslytrying Oct 7
          Replying to @aimlesslytrying @dkingpower7 and

          Actually there was, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23235976 

          2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        4. Williams ✝‏ @aimlesslytrying Oct 7
          Replying to @aimlesslytrying @dkingpower7 and

          And their in the small minority. It like using someone who had surgery, say it was the worst decision in his life, therefore surgeries are bad. The vast majority of circumcised have no difference at all.

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        5. Tweet unavailable
        6. Williams ✝‏ @aimlesslytrying Oct 7
          Replying to @dkingpower7 @Chad_Nine @Gregory_Malchuk

          But there would still be a significant differences if uncircumcised men can experience more pleasure thanks to their foreskin. If that was the case, then circumcised shouldn't have the same sensation to intact ones. Even then, there's studies of men was was intact and then cut-

          2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        7. Williams ✝‏ @aimlesslytrying Oct 7
          Replying to @aimlesslytrying @dkingpower7 and

          -with no actual sign of differences. I like you conspiracy theory on why men lie to themselves on their sensations, but I'll need some evidence for that.

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        8. 1 more reply
        1. New conversation
        2. Dex G Shep‏ @DexGShep Oct 7
          Replying to @aimlesslytrying @dkingpower7 and

          Actually, a peer-reviewed study in the British Journal of Urology in 2007 concluded that "Circumcision ablates the most sensitive parts of the penis." Given that conclusion, how could circumcision possibly not cause a difference in sensation? Source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17378847 

          1 reply 2 retweets 5 likes
        3. Williams ✝‏ @aimlesslytrying Oct 7
          Replying to @DexGShep @dkingpower7 and

          Which was later criticized/debunked in a systematic review study: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23749001  And one that shows how it confused the data: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27610340 

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        4. Dex G Shep‏ @DexGShep Oct 7
          Replying to @aimlesslytrying @dkingpower7 and

          I see nothing in either of the links you provided that actually debunks the study that I linked.

          1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
        5. Williams ✝‏ @aimlesslytrying Oct 8
          Replying to @DexGShep @dkingpower7 and

          The first study: Speculative assertions that the removal of fine-touch neuroreceptors of the foreskin, reorganization/atrophy of neural circuitry and keratinisation of the glans penis as a result of circumcision might lower sensitivity and lead to sexual dysfunction-

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        6. Williams ✝‏ @aimlesslytrying Oct 8
          Replying to @aimlesslytrying @DexGShep and

          8,15,16,17 have been refuted by the American Academy of Pediatrics and through evaluations by experts of such reports.14,18,19,20,21,22.

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        7. Dex G Shep‏ @DexGShep Oct 10
          Replying to @aimlesslytrying @dkingpower7 and

          Following the citations, 16 is the study I linked, and 18 is the only citation I see that attempts to refute it. 18 is not a study; it is an opinion piece by B. Morris & J. Waskett, who are not doctors but are known to have a pro-genital-cutting bias. It is not a credible source.

          2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
        8. Williams ✝‏ @aimlesslytrying Oct 10
          Replying to @DexGShep @dkingpower7 and

          The study that you linked tried to prove ideas and assumptions that has already been debunked by other studies. Nope 18 is a study, it have citations of different studies, shows a clear methodology of their findings, and etc. Just because you don't understand/like it, doesn't-

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        9. Williams ✝‏ @aimlesslytrying Oct 10
          Replying to @aimlesslytrying @DexGShep and

          -mean it's not a study. Morris worked in medical science and you don't have to be a doctor to make conclusive data. Waskett is the same, since he still provide conclusive data for his research. You haven't shown how these studies are wrong, but you don't trust them

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        10. 6 more replies
        1. New conversation
        2. Williams ✝‏ @aimlesslytrying Oct 7
          Replying to @dkingpower7 @Chad_Nine @Gregory_Malchuk

          And? He used a flawed study for his purpose and it didn't even work. It's like if vaccines was introduced the same way to reduce pleasure. It doesn't matter how it was introduced, if it doesn't even do said thing it was introduced for.

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        3. Tweet unavailable
        4. Williams ✝‏ @aimlesslytrying Oct 7
          Replying to @dkingpower7 @Chad_Nine @Gregory_Malchuk

          Well when the differences are non-existent and no actual dangerous damages are shown, then really he did failed. It was this one: http://muse.jhu.edu/article/4718/pdf …

          2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        5. Tweet unavailable
        6. Williams ✝‏ @aimlesslytrying Oct 7
          Replying to @dkingpower7 @Chad_Nine @Gregory_Malchuk

          Wrong link: https://web.archive.org/web/20150221220002/http://etext.lib.virginia.edu/etcbin/toccer-new2?id=KelPlai.sgm&images=images%2Fmodeng&data=%2Ftexts%2Fenglish%2Fmodeng%2Fparsed&tag=public&part=11&division=div1 … Basically reach this conclusion or got the results for what he saying thanks to the help of Dr. Archibald, Superintendent of the Iowa Asylum for Feeble-Minded Children

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        7. Tweet unavailable
        8. Williams ✝‏ @aimlesslytrying Oct 7
          Replying to @dkingpower7 @Chad_Nine @Gregory_Malchuk

          Source?

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        9. 2 more replies

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2018 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Cookies
        • Ads info