Wherein @DavidFutrelle advocates deplatforming incels from online forums, following the ‘success’ of deplatforming the alt-right.
The ‘successful deplatforming’ narrative ignores material conditions predicating radicalisation - which haven’t changed.https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/article-can-the-radicalization-of-incels-be-stopped/ …
-
-
So what's your plan then?
-
1. I think it needs to be conceptually far broader than simply sweeping away the outcome of neoliberal alienation such that we can’t see it anymore. 2. Pretty juvenile response. I’m not sure I have all the answers but I’m not penning editorials in the National paper.
-
So you really don't have anything but a pile of jargon?
-
I’ve asked you to provide criteria by which alt right deplatforming constitutes a successful defeat of revanchist ideology. You didn’t respond. I asked what principle differentiates one disfavoured ideology from another. You didn’t respond. I don’t get why the snarky attitude?
-
All of western european countries have well defined laws against hate speech. You can argue that they don't work, but saying there is no criterium already established is false.
-
That is different. I want to know who the assholes that need to be watched are. I wamt them to be loud and stupid. I don't want Sam Harris inviting them to his podcast (predicting now) because he doesn't agree but empathizes with their censored "condition"
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Of course yeah, physically disrupting fascist organisation is idealistic mysticism. Still want to know the specific "structural and material condition at play" in the production of male terrorists and domestic abusers.
-
It is called anything that causes stress. As Slavoj Zizek would say, there is a history of previous actions and material causes for every predestined horrible action That these stresses exist does not absolve or lessen the responsibility of the action taker but the causes remain
-
Ahhhh did I reply at the top of the thread instead of the bottom?
-
All good
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Sorry what did I miss. Been on the phone customeruncare for
@FlightNetwork They and@JAL_Official_jp had a misfired synapse and canceled my flight but so graciously offered a similar flight for 1000$ more. -
Can we redistribute access to flights cause I am legitimately involuntarily flightless.
#Infli ?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It's not really mystical to say that if you shut down their forums it makes it harder for them to reach people. If you get them kicked off fundraising platforms it makes it harder for them to raise funds.
-
15 years ago this was true I think. Now not so much. You will have a 10% 20% reduction? You would also have them playing semantics and getting the same Katie Hopkins free speech claims once their rhetoric is suitably dogwhistled.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.