Preskoči na sadržaj
Korištenjem servisa na Twitteru pristajete na korištenje kolačića. Twitter i partneri rade globalno te koriste kolačiće za analize, personalizaciju i oglase.

Za najbolje sučelje na Twitteru koristite Microsoft Edge ili instalirajte aplikaciju Twitter iz trgovine Microsoft Store.

  • Naslovnica Naslovnica Naslovnica, trenutna stranica.
  • O Twitteru

Spremljena pretraživanja

  • obriši
  • U ovom razgovoru
    Ovjeren akauntZaštićeni tweetovi @
Predloženi korisnici
  • Ovjeren akauntZaštićeni tweetovi @
  • Ovjeren akauntZaštićeni tweetovi @
  • Jezik: Hrvatski
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • Ελληνικά
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Imate račun? Prijava
    Imate račun?
    · Zaboravili ste lozinku?

    Novi ste na Twitteru?
    Registrirajte se
Profil korisnika/ce ah__cl
Aurelie Herbelot
Aurelie Herbelot
Aurelie Herbelot
@ah__cl

Tweets

Aurelie Herbelot

@ah__cl

PI at the Centre for Mind/Brain Sciences, University of Trento. My group is CALM (Computational Approaches to Language and Meaning).

Planet Earth
aurelieherbelot.net
Vrijeme pridruživanja: listopad 2017.

Tweets

  • © 2020 Twitter
  • O Twitteru
  • Centar za pomoć
  • Uvjeti
  • Pravila o privatnosti
  • Imprint
  • Kolačići
  • Informacije o oglasima
Odbaci
Prethodni
Sljedeće

Idite na profil osobe

Spremljena pretraživanja

  • obriši
  • U ovom razgovoru
    Ovjeren akauntZaštićeni tweetovi @
Predloženi korisnici
  • Ovjeren akauntZaštićeni tweetovi @
  • Ovjeren akauntZaštićeni tweetovi @

Odjava

Blokiraj

  • Objavi Tweet s lokacijom

    U tweetove putem weba ili aplikacija drugih proizvođača možete dodati podatke o lokaciji, kao što su grad ili točna lokacija. Povijest lokacija tweetova uvijek možete izbrisati. Saznajte više

    Vaši popisi

    Izradi novi popis


    Manje od 100 znakova, neobavezno

    Privatnost

    Kopiraj vezu u tweet

    Ugradi ovaj Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Dodajte ovaj Tweet na svoje web-mjesto kopiranjem koda u nastavku. Saznajte više

    Dodajte ovaj videozapis na svoje web-mjesto kopiranjem koda u nastavku. Saznajte više

    Hm, došlo je do problema prilikom povezivanja s poslužiteljem.

    Integracijom Twitterova sadržaja u svoje web-mjesto ili aplikaciju prihvaćate Twitterov Ugovor za programere i Pravila za programere.

    Pregled

    Razlog prikaza oglasa

    Prijavi se na Twitter

    · Zaboravili ste lozinku?
    Nemate račun? Registrirajte se »

    Prijavite se na Twitter

    Niste na Twitteru? Registrirajte se, uključite se u stvari koje vas zanimaju, i dobivajte promjene čim se dogode.

    Registrirajte se
    Imate račun? Prijava »

    Dvosmjerni (slanje i primanje) kratki kodovi:

    Država Kod Samo za korisnike
    Sjedinjene Američke Države 40404 (bilo koje)
    Kanada 21212 (bilo koje)
    Ujedinjeno Kraljevstvo 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Irska 51210 Vodafone, O2
    Indija 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonezija 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italija 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » Pogledajte SMS kratke šifre za druge zemlje

    Potvrda

     

    Dobro došli kući!

    Vremenska crta mjesto je na kojem ćete provesti najviše vremena i bez odgode dobivati novosti o svemu što vam je važno.

    Tweetovi vam ne valjaju?

    Prijeđite pokazivačem preko slike profila pa kliknite gumb Pratim da biste prestali pratiti neki račun.

    Kažite mnogo uz malo riječi

    Kada vidite Tweet koji volite, dodirnite srce – to osobi koja ga je napisala daje do znanja da vam se sviđa.

    Proširite glas

    Najbolji je način da podijelite nečiji Tweet s osobama koje vas prate prosljeđivanje. Dodirnite ikonu da biste smjesta poslali.

    Pridruži se razgovoru

    Pomoću odgovora dodajte sve što mislite o nekom tweetu. Pronađite temu koja vam je važna i uključite se.

    Saznajte najnovije vijesti

    Bez odgode pogledajte o čemu ljudi razgovaraju.

    Pratite više onoga što vam se sviđa

    Pratite više računa da biste dobivali novosti o temama do kojih vam je stalo.

    Saznajte što se događa

    Bez odgode pogledajte najnovije razgovore o bilo kojoj temi.

    Ne propustite nijedan aktualni događaj

    Bez odgode pratite kako se razvijaju događaji koje pratite.

    Aurelie Herbelot‏ @ah__cl 11. sij
    • Prijavi Tweet

    Here's a thread surveying some 'classic' work on #compositionality. Lots of people seem to be discussing this right now, but with partial references to the whole story. My aim is to highlight some of the philosophical and psychological issues in the history of the concept. 1/

    08:32 - 11. sij 2020.
    • 63 proslijeđena tweeta
    • 224 oznake „sviđa mi se”
    • 橘zzy - Kevin Lande Silvester Sa David Barner Ronen Tamari Colin Gordon Aaditya Swayson
    63 proslijeđena tweeta 224 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
      1. Novi razgovor
      2. Aurelie Herbelot‏ @ah__cl 11. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        Small recap first... There are two principles usually associated with #compositionality, both (possibly incorrectly) attributed to Frege. See Pelletier's "Did Frege believe in Frege's principle?" (2001). 2/

        1 reply 1 proslijeđeni tweet 4 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      3. Aurelie Herbelot‏ @ah__cl 11. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        1) Bottom-up, the 'compositionality principle': "... an important general principle which we shall discuss later under the name Frege's Principle, that the meaning of the whole sentence is a function of the meanings of its parts.'" Cresswell (1973) 3/

        1 proslijeđeni tweet 6 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      4. Aurelie Herbelot‏ @ah__cl 11. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        2) Top-down, the 'context principle': "[I]t's a famous Fregean view that words have meaning only as constituents of (hence, presumably, only in virtue of their use in) sentences." (Fodor and LePore, 1992) 4/

        1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 6 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      5. Aurelie Herbelot‏ @ah__cl 11. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        The two principles are at odds. So what *is* compositionality? Partee's answer (1984): "Given the extreme theory-dependence of the compositionality principle and the diversity of existing (pieces of) theories, it would be hopeless to try to enumerate all its possible versions."/5

        1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 6 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      6. Aurelie Herbelot‏ @ah__cl 11. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        So it may be impossible to clearly define #compositionality, but Partee suggest to at least pinpoint the latent features of the phenomenon. I'll focus here on a) its relation to syntax; b) relation to cognition; c) the nature of meaning itself; d) the nature of 'context'. /6

        1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 3 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      7. Aurelie Herbelot‏ @ah__cl 11. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        The first use of the term #compositionality, as far as I know, is in Katz and Fodor (1963): "As a rule, the meaning of a word is a compositional function of the meanings of its parts, and we would like to be able to capture this compositionality." /7

        1 proslijeđeni tweet 7 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      8. Aurelie Herbelot‏ @ah__cl 11. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        In that paper, K&F try to adapt Chomsky's notion of competence to the area of semantics. They're concerned with the bottom-up principle, which they call 'the Projection Problem'. They propose that semantics follows grammar rule-by-rule, according to an 'amalgamation' process. /8

        1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 3 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      9. Aurelie Herbelot‏ @ah__cl 11. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        K&F's 'amalgamation' is "the joining of elements from different sets of paths under a given grammatical marker if these elements satisfy the appropriate selection restrictions". Appropriate rules are encoded in the lexicon, and mastery of the lexicon is part of competence. /9

        1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 3 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      10. Aurelie Herbelot‏ @ah__cl 11. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        For K&F, semantics -- like syntax -- does not use "information about setting" and is "independent of individual differences between speakers". However they also readily accept a weak version of context as discourse dependence in the spirit of Harris and the distributionalists /10

        1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 4 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      11. Aurelie Herbelot‏ @ah__cl 11. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        The problem with the Chomskian account (and by extent K&F's) is that it gets into trouble with quantifiers. "Every candidate voted for every candidate" is not equivalent to "Every candidate voted for him/herself." But that's what transformational grammar would predict. /11

        1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 5 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      12. Aurelie Herbelot‏ @ah__cl 11. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        Enters Montague. Like K&F, Montague believes in a homomorphism between syntax and semantics, but the actual implementation of that homomorphism is to be done via model theory. Suddenly, sentences have truth values and parts of sentences have extensions. /12

        1 reply 1 proslijeđeni tweet 4 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      13. Aurelie Herbelot‏ @ah__cl 11. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        An important side note on truth from Partee (2011): "semantics itself is in the first instance concerned with truth-conditions (not actual truth, as is sometimes mistakenly asserted) and entailment relations, not with internal representations." /13

        1 reply 1 proslijeđeni tweet 3 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      14. Aurelie Herbelot‏ @ah__cl 11. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        That is, the Montagovian account is not a cognitive account. Also, truth does not have anything to do with the real world. If you want ideas sleeping (furiously or not), you intersect the set of ideas and the set of sleeping things. Done. /14pic.twitter.com/hzZ6mCa5e6

        1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 9 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      15. Aurelie Herbelot‏ @ah__cl 11. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        Montague posits an infinity of possible worlds, with sentences being true in a set of worlds and constituents having intensions that map worlds to extensions. The account seems essentially bottom-up. And still, the notion of context does appear in his work... /15

        1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 2 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      16. Aurelie Herbelot‏ @ah__cl 11. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        In a 1970 essay on pragmatics, Montague introduces contexts of use: who utters the sentence, where and when; the state of the world; the surrounding discourse, etc. Context is formalised as a finite tuple of indexicals. Intensions become functions from indices to extensions. /16

        1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 2 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      17. Aurelie Herbelot‏ @ah__cl 11. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        One problem with the Montagovian account is its anti-psychologism. Partee (1979, 2014) highlights the difficulties of reconciling truth theory with the notion of competence, in particular when it comes to propositional attitudes. /17

        0 proslijeđenih tweetova 2 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      18. Aurelie Herbelot‏ @ah__cl 11. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        I also note that logicians take possible worlds for granted and never explain where exactly they come from. Here's where Fillmore comes in. /18

        1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 5 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      19. Aurelie Herbelot‏ @ah__cl 11. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        Initially, Fillmore is involved in syntactic work in the spirit of transformational grammar (1982). He develops 'case grammar' to encode selectional restrictions and Katz and Fodor’s projection rules. This is to become frame semantics. /19

        1 reply 1 proslijeđeni tweet 4 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      20. Aurelie Herbelot‏ @ah__cl 11. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        For Fillmore, a frame is a conceptual representation of a scene: "I thought of each case frame as characterizing a small abstract 'scene' [...] so that to understand the semantic structure of the verb it was necessary to understand the properties of such schematized scenes." /20

        1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 2 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      21. Aurelie Herbelot‏ @ah__cl 11. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        Fillmore is interested in explaining why a speaker chose the specific words they uttered. He formalises this idea in the notion of 'U-semantics' (1985). His semantics is perhaps the first to try and explicitly encode the paradox of the two principles of compositionality: ... /21

        1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 3 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      22. Aurelie Herbelot‏ @ah__cl 11. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        "The U-semantics account is compositional in that its operation depends on knowledge of the meanings of individual lexical items [...], but it is also 'non-compositional' in that the construction process is not guided by purely symbolic operations from bottom to top." /22

        1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 2 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      23. Aurelie Herbelot‏ @ah__cl 11. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        As in Katz & Fodor, Fillmore's account is cognitive, but it does not cleanly distinguish syntax from semantics from pragmatics. As in Montague, truth is no metaphysical truth, it is the way speakers *perceive* the real world. But it does not provide a notion of extension. /23

        1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 2 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      24. Aurelie Herbelot‏ @ah__cl 11. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        Frame semantics does not have a proper account of things, worlds, and quantification over things/worlds.To find a cognitive account of the way truth values can be computed over possible worlds, we must jump to generative probabilistic models (e.g. Goodman and Lassiter, 2015). /24

        1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 2 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      25. Aurelie Herbelot‏ @ah__cl 11. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        Where do generative models stand? Against Fillmore, they draw a clear boundary between the world creation process and semantics. Against Montague, they anchor their possible worlds in probabilities learned from the real world. But there is more to language than the real world /25

        1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 2 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      26. Aurelie Herbelot‏ @ah__cl 11. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        Talking of concept combination, Hampton (1991) shows people will try to make sense of anything (contra Chomsky). What is a fish that is a vehicle? "Some put a saddle on the back of the fish [...] while others surgically implanted a pressurized compartment within the fish." /26

        1 proslijeđeni tweet 7 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      27. Aurelie Herbelot‏ @ah__cl 11. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        So when making sense of unattested combinations, people are able to generate the possible world that would make the sentence true / the extension non-empty. If required, that world can be very far from reality. /27

        1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 6 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      28. Aurelie Herbelot‏ @ah__cl 11. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        To summarise, let's just note that theories overlap and disagree on the topics of cognition, the autonomy of semantics wrt syntax and pragmatics, the idea of acceptability, the focus on (lexical) types vs (world) objects /28

        1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 2 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      29. Aurelie Herbelot‏ @ah__cl 11. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        The message: #compositionality remains a mystery because it is difficult to isolate the phenomenon. It interacts with our notions of syntax and pragmatics, our working definitions of meaning/worlds, and epistemological questions about linguistics (do we care about the mind?) /29

        1 reply 1 proslijeđeni tweet 13 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      30. Aurelie Herbelot‏ @ah__cl 11. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        So there may not be an ultimate definition of #compositionality in sight. Still, we can develop working definitions that are useful to subfields. A great example is @emilymbender et al (2015) wrt parsing, which explicitly addresses the compositionality vs context paradox. /30

        1 reply 1 proslijeđeni tweet 7 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      31. Aurelie Herbelot‏ @ah__cl 11. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        Let's just make sure we are *aware* of all aspects of the question. It is a rather large one. /31

        0 proslijeđenih tweetova 9 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      32. Još 1 odgovor

    Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

    Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

      Sponzorirani tweet

      false

      • © 2020 Twitter
      • O Twitteru
      • Centar za pomoć
      • Uvjeti
      • Pravila o privatnosti
      • Imprint
      • Kolačići
      • Informacije o oglasima