This isn’t news. HK studies indicated that as many as 60% of infected people in turn infect no one at all. A small percentage is infecting a large percentage. But we can’t know who from whom.
"A growing body of research suggests that a significant number of confirmed COVID infections in the US, perhaps as many as 9 out of every 10, may not be infectious at all."https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/coronavirus/growing-body-research-indicates-many-confirmed-covid-19-cases-might-not …
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
-
-
-
Non-infectious, asymptomatics should not be called "cases", the number of which is driving authoritarian government intervention, and they certainly shouldn't be included in death counts.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Nobody knows anything.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks, added to my long cycle threshold thread
https://twitter.com/DaFeid/status/1304502039389573121?s=19 …1/17 It's been 2 weeks now since NYT reported up to 90% false positive due to "cycle threshold settings". PCR cycle threshold topic is cruical. As tweets usually have just a half-time of max. 30 min
Thread 
https://twitter.com/kerpen/status/1302234131707944961?s=20 …Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I don’t understand the graph. How can there be any correlation between cycles and culturing for positives? Seems to me, the better study is to determine minimal PCR cycles that correlate with a positive culture – and then use that minimal number of PCR cycles and don’t use more.
- Show replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.