In the dictionary, replicable: "able to be copied or reproduced exactly." In other words... reproducible. I find it dangerous when scientists re-define common words to give them super specific meaning like that. I'd rather spell out "replication on independent data"
This is my favorite table when it comes to the definition of reproducibility. @kirstie_j is talking about the #TuringWay in #openmrb2020!pic.twitter.com/09YzZpOAiX
-
-
-
These terms have been redefined repeatedly and their usage seems to differ by field -- I quite like this summary of the existing (re-)definitions: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5778115/ …)
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
where would you put reliability?
-
Can you define reliability? I’d imagine some people mean it’s **robust** to differences in initial conditions in the code etc but if it means getting the same answers on multiple sets of data the it falls in **replicable**.
#TuringWay - Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
I’m a bit confused by this graph... so same and different are in terms of who’s producing/analyzing the data? ~thanks~
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.