Choosing the right solution/vendor to buy into is a hard problem tho. And it's often a hard sell in an agile culture to do months of upfront research and planning before showing progress.
For Code, LF wont employ developers to foster, but not overly influence community. For Training, LF does training unilaterally without community oversight or contribution. Perhaps convenient, but far from ideal, and not true to LF or OSS principles
-
-
LF does not do training unilaterally, sorry that's wrong... we work often with community maintainers to create the training... e.g., CKA/CKAD we invited the community and work on the curriculum like an open source projecthttps://github.com/cncf/curriculum
-
I apologize that was a poor choice of words, everything at LF does have oversight, but for education development it is a much less open process than for code or documentation
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
