There needs to be room for verifiable by statistical probability, definitely.
-
-
-
True, but I also think we need to avoid falling into the trap of "scientism", or over-reliance on scientific rationality. There is always an element of subjectivity in every human endeavour, and scientists are not immune from this. Doesn't negate science, just need some nuance.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
This is hypothesis free science. See what serious scientists think about it. A Fight for the Soul of Science. George FR Ellis is pictured. https://www.quantamagazine.org/20151216-physicists-and-philosophers-debate-the-boundaries-of-science/ … "Silk accused these theorists of “moving the goalposts” of science and blurring the line between physics and..."
-
1) WE are all in this as One. WE must be transparent and understand what this describes. All of us awakened and peoples of Gaia must understand at a deep level of potentiality.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
The Pound-Rebka experiment confirmed Newton's variable speed of light - see the 4th paragraph here: http://virgo.lal.in2p3.fr/NPAC/relativite_fichiers/pound.pdf … Newton's variable speed of light is incompatible with gravitational time dilation. This means that the PR experiment disproved general relativity. Absurd:pic.twitter.com/pNbYqVeHYe
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
LOGICAL falsification (reductio ad absurdum): Relativity absurdly predicts that unlimitedly long objects can be trapped inside unlimitedly short containers: "barn, 40m long...pole, 80m long...the rod will be trapped in a compressed state inside the barn" http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/barn_pole.html …pic.twitter.com/EWXTLH9o1M
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Relativity is unambiguously falsified by Doppler measurements. Both frequency and speed of light VARY for the moving observer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bg7O4rtlwEE … Einsteinians clearly see that the speed of light is variable but believe and teach that it is constant.pic.twitter.com/MJE99EdpyL
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
In 1887 the constancy of the speed of light was disproved: John Norton: "The Michelson-Morley experiment is fully compatible with an emission theory of light that CONTRADICTS THE LIGHT POSTULATE." http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/1743/2/Norton.pdf … Relativity survives thanks to crimestop:pic.twitter.com/SZbAgkpLvk
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
As long as they're labeled hypothesis and not physics. However, from Newton to Einstein, all were looking for truth. Also, see Pooper "The Logic of Discovery".
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.