Agh. The ignorance in this essay is severe. As is usual for science reporters when they venture into religion.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Seriously, why do these tired narratives have to be trotted out after excellent work by Ian Barbour, Peter Bowler, Karl Giberson?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And the essay cites a Papal address that completely falsifies the clickbait title.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Bullshit pieces like this totally fry my hide.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Decent treatment of Haught, but there is so much more out there. See? http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/07/18/971619/-A-Chronicle-of-Religious-well-Christian-Affirmations-of-Evolution …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If evolution is a property of life, that makes the nature of life, even more of a miracle.
-
Your logical fallacy is Non sequitur. btw miracles don't exist.
@aeonmag
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Nor does the Vatican deny evolution. Pope Pius VII had quite a lot to say about it too. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_Church_and_evolution …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.