Pondering ineffibles. It should be clear That a thing must either be literal (tangible), or literal like. In order to be expressed. In a way. This is analogous to the way our universe appears to us as two distinct and separate types of structures. As a logical structure described
-
-
-
As approximation. By using Newtonian physics. And, on the other hand. A language structure that appears to us as a declarative language of sorts (i. e. statistics). In any a case. A separation of these two distinct sets of operation will need not be deemed necessary in such cases
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
The texts below effectively say that, if the speed of light is variable (it is), fundamental physics, entirely predicated on Einstein's false constancy, is long dead (exists as a farce). See a possible resurrection (if it's not too late) in a series of tweets here:
@pentcho_valevpic.twitter.com/cmQsclpWBo
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Wasn't the notion, 'pattern-seeking brains', a blind presumption? …http://hiddenobserveronthelimitationsofmind.blogspot.com/2013/07/what-is-mind-stuff-as-schemed-by-nature.html?m=1 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.