Suppose humans developed a propensity P for long-term mating relationships & humans loaded P w value despite their belief B that it reduces fitness. Selectivists can say either that B's false—o/w P wouldn't have been selected—or that B's true in spite of P being selected...
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
-
Yet, in the 1st case they take for granted that the reasons humans have for believing B are false regardless, while in the 2nd case they should admit that non-adaptive behaviors such P can be selected due to the fact that humans load them w value, not bc P increases their fitness
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Adultery by Women is near to impossible to prove in a Court of Law Nothing is Real which is Not Forever Love is a Cosmic Conspiracy +can be Astrogically Proved if Horscopes of ppl in Affair cross verified - Both wld've Venus in 5th house or Venus-Period during Romantic phase
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.