Great piece.
-
-
-
Thanks - much appreciated!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Yeah, nothing to disagree with there,
@azulbuho. -
It made me think. To the extent that I understand it, I think I believe in a multiverse like religious people believe in deities, or kids believe in Father Christmas. It's appealing to me. I hope it's true.
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
It would be better and sufficient to distinguish good science from bad science. 'Pseudoscience' is just a club used on theories someone doesn't like.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
“Post-empirical science is an oxymoron” - without the oxygen-sensing mechanism discovered by the Nobel Prize winners, we would all be morons. I, in my great and unmatched wisdom, know this to be true.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
There are realms beyond what the author contemplated to think better, for a much better Science, more strictly adhering to her old,famed SPIRIT: …http://thewhyquestionofexistenceanswered.blogspot.com/2019/08/has-life-any-meaning-and-sense-why-life.html?m=1 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Mostly a good article but there does not exist "something called Bayesian probability theory" which has an "entirely subjective nature". There exist Bayesian interpretations of probability of varying degrees of subjectivity. That paragraph is abominable.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Good article, but just because something is metaphysical gives no reason to think it's false. It's just an issue that can't be answered by science is all.
-
“Many-Worlds” theory in quantum mechanics is metaphysically extravagant.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.