It is a wonder that philosophy has not come up with a contextual theorem of meaning. In some sense this is understandable as language games tend to be fraught with problems. With any word (or string of words) carrying a set of definable attributes stuck outside of the word itself
-
-
-
This means that in order to aquire meaningful statements there must be a high degree of correlation between the two different sets (i. e. between language and the world we occupy). How does one go by such a thing? At we could look at what we could call inner context (of the word)
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.