The argument is over what constitutes evidence.
-
-
-
I'm glad someone else thought this.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Believing without evidence that a passer-by in a quiet street won't attack you, that your partner is faithful, that the justice system works, is not only morally right but unavoidable for the society as we know it to exist
-
I dont think those examples fall under "believing" Its more like an assumption and its based on experience and environment One would be foolish not to worry about an unknown passer-by in say... a war zone
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Fortunately, being morally wrong is also a belief. As is a faith in an absolute true, or an unequivocal science.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If you have evidence you don’t need to believe anymore . Believing is acceptance without full evidence, which I think it applies to almost everything
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.