This is a much better summative statement for the article.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think
@sjrabinov that is too optimistic believing that "it is impossible for any group to live in a society, or at least a liberal-democratic society, non-reciprocally". Religious groups for instance thrive exactly on the superstition of their moral and bodily purity. -
I'm not sure I'd agree with the characterization of religious groups, but leaving that aside, how do they eat? How do they clothe their families? Upon whose protection do they rely?
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.