Adam Robbert

@AE_Robbert

I run . Philosophy as a way of life, askēsis, Pierre Hadot, contemplative practice, perception, sensemaking, aesthetics, and media ecology.

San Francisco
Vrijeme pridruživanja: studeni 2011.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @AE_Robbert

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @AE_Robbert

  1. Prikvačeni tweet
    18. stu 2019.

    TSV 3 Call for Papers: Collective Navigation "We are, as a collective, developing new organs of perception." Proposals due by Friday, December 6. Full call and description here:

    Poništi
  2. prije 10 minuta

    This was a bit rhetorical, but only a bit. Curious to hear your answers!

    Poništi
  3. prije 2 sata

    The structure of reason is discernible and communicable, at least this is the premise upon which we claim something is reasonable or not reasonable, otherwise we wouldn’t be able to make such a judgment. From which standpoint do we observe and evaluate the structure of reason?

    Poništi
  4. prije 8 sati

    This was fun. I’ll share the link when the episode posts.

    Poništi
  5. 2. velj

    Sometimes, I like the given just fine.

    Poništi
  6. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    2. velj

    No other Dem can pull a crowd like this. The Democrat party wants everything except democracy

    Poništi
  7. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    1. velj

    Speaking of contributors, if you’re not already, give a follow. He’s developing great insights into the asymmetries of our relationship with much “social” technology.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  8. 1. velj

    Speaking of contributors, if you’re not already, give a follow. He’s developing great insights into the asymmetries of our relationship with much “social” technology.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  9. 1. velj

    I'm digging into the drafts for TSV 3 today. I'm really excited about it. Wonderful people with insightful ideas. Each issue advances the project a little more. We're laying the path down in walking, as the saying goes.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  10. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    31. sij

    This is an advertisement for the nonverbal humanities.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  11. 31. sij

    You become a thoroughly linguistic subject first, and then go on to find all of the meaning and sense in language, etc.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  12. 31. sij

    This is an advertisement for the nonverbal humanities.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  13. 31. sij

    It's a guess, but I suspect the linguistic turn in philosophy, to say nothing of its over-identification with grammar, discourse, reading, etc., is at least in part a result of the media ecology of the academic environment. (Also likely why nonverbal practice is underemphasized.)

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  14. 31. sij

    “If our politics stops with such private practices, it is inadequate, but if it does not grow out of private practices, it is liable to be warped and damaging.”

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  15. 31. sij

    Thomas Merton’s Contemplative Politics: “Nonetheless, Merton’s commitment to a contemplative politics has much to teach us about how to live and act in a time when politics seems to be reduced to shrill voices one-upping each other on Twitter and TV.”

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  16. 31. sij

    Still one of the best sources on the question. WTF did written language do to us, anyway?

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  17. 31. sij

    Anyone else do this? Write & edit papers in their head? I do. I wonder if this is just a way of thinking writers are predisposed to, and that’s why they end up being writers, or if all the writing & editing feeds back & drives highly verbal modes of thinking. Both, probably.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  18. 30. sij

    If I had written this paper today, I would've included sections not just on spaces or places, but on time and timing as holding their own kind of affordance potential.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  19. 30. sij
    Poništi
  20. 29. sij

    Another question: Combatting information distortion / “fake news” / pollution of the information ecology, etc. through control mechanisms is bound to produce a whole set of new problems. Who is having that conversation?

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  21. 29. sij

    A question for folks who study this stuff more closely than I do: My view is that when it comes to something like political polarization / radicalization, quite a bit has to go awry in the IRL world first (e.g., economic disparity) for these things to take hold. Thoughts?

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·