For decades, but especially in the late 90s & 00s, game journalism talked about game engines in a way that suggested they knew shit.
Okay, game journalism, here is a thing that you have fucked up for game devs, and you need to repair the damage: Stop talking about engines.pic.twitter.com/q4Reaer5xc
-
-
-
PR takes a lot of blame for talking about engines like the most important thing, but journalists parroted it uncritically in most cases.
- 11 réponses de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
Maybe he just doesn't like unity and buys games to satisfy his interest in background tech moreso than the actual game product
-
When you say it like that, it just sounds like a really, really specific fetish.
- 3 réponses de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
Most people don't even know what a game engine is. Most conflate a renderer with a game engine.
-
Yup. This is the most common understanding of a "game engine".
- 7 réponses de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
I agree. It's so rare to see them talked about well, it's more than likely better not to even mention it.
-
I agree with this. Talking about engine is good for people who wants to get into games. They can learn what an engine was able to do/build
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
...which is a licensed version of CryEngine. They switched because Amazon offered better support than Crytek.
-
Feels inaccurate. RSI pretty much brought out alot of CryEngine devs. I suspect the support Amazon provides is very specific to online tools
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.