this... sounds like peer review working as intended?https://twitter.com/ConceptualJames/status/1058091050261233664 …
-
-
The difference is you can't get a math paper published by learning to imitate the way a mathematician talks
-
I mean, if you imitated it well enough you definitely could.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The difference is that other academic disciplines actually have better standards that do not rely on appealing to ideology to be considered "correct". That linguistic paper example you mentioned is not even a valid comparison.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But math isn’t dumb. And even theoretical math that may eventually be proven wrong isn’t creating a backlash that gets idiots like Trump elected.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Lol I mean if you can read their work regarding "breastaurant pastiches" and vulva moon shrines and compare it to objective scholarship you have drank the koolade. To use your example. Its like they wrote a math paper just guessing equations and got it published.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.