Adam WinklerVerifisert konto

@adamwinkler

Professor specializing in constitutional law, Supreme Court, 2d Amendment. Author of We the Corporations (National Book Award finalist) & Gunfight.

Los Angeles, CA
law.ucla.edu/faculty/facult…
Registrerte seg februar 2010
92 bilder og videoer Bilder og videoer

Tweets

Du har blokkert @adamwinkler

Er du sikker på at du vil vise disse tweetene? Dette vil ikke oppheve blokkeringen av @@adamwinkler.

  1. Retweetet
    8. sep.

    “Buttressed by copious statistical evidence, harrowing case studies, and in-depth interviews with prosecutors, defense attorneys, and defendants, this is a knowledgeable and persuasive call for change.” via

    4 svar 25 retweets 61 liker
    Angre
  2. Retweetet
    5. sep.

    . will be taking the helm of later this month, well prepared & well positioned to address the pressing Qs of democracy, race, gender & immigration, public health, & economic & environmental justice which challenge that state & this nation. Godspeed!

    A trenchant, sweeping, & above all sensitive must-read accounting of the last 20 yrs by &
    2 svar 2 retweets 15 liker
    Angre
  3. Retweetet
    5. sep.

    Missouri removed an exhibit on gay history from the state Capitol after just two days. A spokesperson says the Republican governor received “several complaints” about the exhibit, which was supposed to be on display until the end of the year.

    40 svar 185 retweets 337 liker
    Vis denne tråden
    Vis denne tråden
    Angre
  4. Retweetet
    23. aug.

    On the 50th anniversary of the "Powell Memo," here's a link to my 2017 piece. I analyze it at greater length in my book, FREE ENTERPRISE: AN AMERICAN HISTORY.

    3 svar 17 retweets 59 liker
    Vis denne tråden
    Vis denne tråden
    Angre
  5. Retweetet
    23. aug.

    Grateful to all the staff and across country who are going above and beyond to make this school year happen.

    4 retweets 45 liker
    Angre
  6. Retweetet
    11. aug.

    This👇👋👋

    I repeat: A mask mandate may or may not be wise, and all government mandates should be last resorts -- but it ISN'T A BIG DEAL, and isn't tyranny by any means. CHILL OUT.
    1 svar 3 retweets 12 liker
    Angre
  7. Retweetet
    9. aug.

    Hey, CA tweeps. The recall election is scheduled for Tuesday, September 14. Mark your calendars and make a plan to vote in person or by absentee ballot in this special election. And tell others--a lot folks don't have this election on their radars.

    11 svar 102 retweets 201 liker
    Angre
  8. Retweetet
    6. aug.

    See 's great piece; also an exemplar on how and why to write an effective oped:

    1 svar 4 retweets 10 liker
    Angre
  9. Retweetet
    6. aug.

    “For the first time in the development of this whole story — it's clear there was an actual, cognizable plan to overturn the election," says. "An actual strategy to get Donald Trump declared the winner.”

    622 svar 4 901 retweets 12 604 liker
    Angre
  10. Retweetet
    6. aug.

    I agree with here — for the reasons he gives and a half dozen others. The new moratorium is already back in court in DC. If it ends up in SCOTUS, don’t assume it’ll strike down Biden’s new eviction ban. There’s good reason to think it won’t.

    16 svar 100 retweets 303 liker
    Angre
  11. Retweetet
    5. aug.

    There. Is. No. Bottom.

    Philly cops have been towing cars from legal spaces to illegal spaces, impounded the cars from the illegal spaces, and then trying to sell the cars at auction.
    16 svar 70 retweets 260 liker
    Angre
  12. Retweetet
    5. aug.

    Important : The Supreme Court Might Strike Down Biden’s Eviction Ban. It Shouldn’t.

    1 svar 1 retweet 7 liker
    Angre
  13. Retweetet
    5. aug.

    “By deciding the fate of the eviction moratorium off the shadow docket and without any stated reasons, the justices failed to do their job. That shouldn’t stop the C.D.C. and the Biden administration from doing theirs.” Brilliant 👏

    Characteristically smart on whether President Biden acted reasonably in in seeking a new eviction moratorium despite earlier signals about legality from the Supreme Court
    1 retweet 2 liker
    Angre
  14. Retweetet
    5. aug.

    Having said that, I agree with that the Supreme Court should have provided clear guidance when it had the chance to rule on the in July. The Court should have anticipated that his issue would come back.

    1 svar 1 retweet 6 liker
    Vis denne tråden
    Vis denne tråden
    Angre
  15. Retweetet
    5. aug.

    UCLA Law Prof says the eviction moratorium case is an example of the problems with SCOTUS' increasing use of the "shadow docket," where cases raising important issues are decided without full briefing, oral argument, and reasoned opinions.

    1 svar 2 retweets 4 liker
    Angre
  16. Retweetet
    26. jul.

    Despite how Scalia described it, the Sherbert test pretty much operated as that more permissive intermediate scrutiny test anyway, as has documented

    1 svar 1 retweet 5 liker
    Vis denne tråden
    Vis denne tråden
    Angre
  17. Retweetet
    24. jul.

    NYC sent non-police teams to respond to mental health calls for a month. Data shows that more people got help and fewer were hospitalized. Here’s what happened.

    Image shows a New York City police officer talking to an actor during a Crisis Intervention Training class. The police officer is standing in front of the actor who is sitting on a bench with one hand on his head.
    418 svar 6 671 retweets 15 523 liker
    Vis denne tråden
    Vis denne tråden
    Angre
  18. Retweetet
    18. jul.

    Congrats to the fantastic ⁦⁩ ⁦⁩ team for publishing another important and thought-provoking bestseller.

    4 svar 26 retweets 58 liker
    Angre
  19. Retweetet
    10. jul.

    Reviewing a new draft book on Originalism for a major publisher. Love this sentence: “following the original meaning of the Constitution requires abandoning originalism as a method of constitutional interpretation.” Yup.

    5 svar 7 retweets 82 liker
    Angre
  20. 9. jul.

    In other words, this research suggests that more guns does not lead to more gun violence.

    Many people assumed last year's increase in shootings and gun murders was related, at least in part, to the record-breaking surge in US gun sales last year. But researchers took a closer look at the data, and concluded that hypothesis was wrong:
    2 retweets 4 liker
    Angre

@adamwinkler har ikke Tweetet enda.

Lastingen ser ut til å ta sin tid.

Twitter kan være overbelastet, eller det kan ha oppstått et midlertidig problem. Prøv igjen, eller se Twitters status for mer informasjon.

    Du vil kanskje også like

    ·