跳到内容
使用 Twitter 服务即表明你同意我们Cookie 使用。我们和合作伙伴在全球范围内运营并使用 Cookie,用途包括分析、个性化定制和广告。
  • 主页 主页 主页,当前页。
  • 关于

已保存的搜索

  • 移除
  • 在这段对话中
    认证账号保护推文 @
推荐用户
  • 认证账号保护推文 @
  • 认证账号保护推文 @
  • 语言: 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
    • 日本語
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
  • 已有账号? 登录
    已有账号?
    · 忘记密码?

    首次使用 Twitter 吗?
    注册
AdamSerwer 的个人资料
Adam Serwer🍝
Adam Serwer🍝
Adam Serwer 🍝
认证账号
@AdamSerwer

Tweets

Adam Serwer 🍝认证账号

@AdamSerwer

Staff Writer, @TheAtlantic Ideas; currently on leave while at @shorensteinctr. My jokes still aren't funny. adam@theatlantic.com adamserwer@protonmail.com

ÜT: 38.908339,-77.040837
加入于 2008年9月

Tweets

  • © 2019 Twitter
  • 关于
  • 帮助中心
  • 条款
  • 隐私政策
  • Cookies
  • 广告信息
忽略
上一页
下一步

访问个人资料页

已保存的搜索

  • 移除
  • 在这段对话中
    认证账号保护推文 @
推荐用户
  • 认证账号保护推文 @
  • 认证账号保护推文 @

推荐这条推文

屏蔽

  • 发送包含位置信息的推文

    你可以通过网络和第三方应用程序向推文添加位置信息,例如你所在的城市或精确位置。你始终可以选择删除 Tweet 位置记录。 了解更多

    你的列表

    创建新列表


    少于 100 字符,可选

    隐私

    复制推文链接

    嵌入此推文

    Embed this Video

    复制下列代码,把此推文添加到你的网站上。 了解更多

    复制下列代码,把此视频添加到你的网站上。 了解更多

    呃,连接服务器时出错。

    在你的网站或应用中嵌入 Twitter 内容即表示你同意 Twitter 开发者协议 和 开发者政策。

    预览

    你为什么会看到这个广告

    登录 Twitter

    · 忘记密码?
    还没有账号吗? 注册 »

    注册 Twitter

    还没有 Twitter 吗?注册,关注你的兴趣所在,并获取即时更新。

    注册
    已有账号? 登录 »

    双向 (发送与接收) 短代码:

    国家 代码 适合以下运营商
    美国 40404 (任何)
    加拿大 21212 (任何)
    英国 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    巴西 40404 Nextel, TIM
    海地 40404 Digicel, Voila
    爱尔兰 51210 Vodafone, O2
    印度 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    印度尼西亚 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    意大利 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » 查看其他国家的短信短代码

    确认

     

    欢迎来到主页!

    这个时间线是你花费时间最多的地方,供你获取你关心事物的最新动态。

    推文出问题了?

    鼠标悬停在个人资料图片上并点击“正在关注”按钮,即可取消关注任何账号。

    言简意赅

    当你看到一条自己喜欢的推文时,点击爱心,即可让作者知道你分享了爱。

    传播消息

    和你的关注者分享别人推文的最快捷方式就是转推。点击图标立即发出转推。

    加入对话

    通过回复,提出你对任何推文的看法。找出一个让你充满热情的话题,立即加入进去。

    了解最新动态

    对人们正在讨论的话题获得即时洞察。

    获得更多你喜爱的内容

    关注更多账号,获得关于你关心话题的最新动态。

    了解正在发生的事情

    即时看到关于任何话题的最新讨论

    从不错过任何瞬间

    即刻捕获刚刚呈现的精彩故事。

    Adam Serwer 🍝‏认证账号 @AdamSerwer 4月26日

    Robert E. Lee was a traitor, a brute and a slaver who wouldn't even trade black union soldiers taken prisoner for the lives of his own men because he saw black people as property to be owned.https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/06/the-myth-of-the-kindly-general-lee/529038/ …

    上午7:15 - 2019年4月26日
    • 15,581 转推
    • 41,139 喜欢
    • Meg NicNacNoo Christian Cri 🕊🐝🐜 Robert Sime Turney Duff little gull Lacy Johnson Robert Mcmillian
    916回复 15,581 转推 41,139 喜欢
      1. Adam Serwer 🍝‏认证账号 @AdamSerwer 4月26日

        Contrary to myth, Lee did not oppose slavery or secession. He called slavery “necessary for their instruction as a race,” he enslaved free black people in his invasion of the North, and after the war, opposed black suffrage.https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/06/the-myth-of-the-kindly-general-lee/529038/ …

        143回复 2,413 转推 6,437 喜欢
        显示这个主题帖
        谢谢。Twitter 会使用此信息,来优化你的时间线。 撤销
        撤销
      1. 新对话
      2. Round Table Decision‏ @RoundTableIB 4月26日
        回复 @AdamSerwer

        The counter movement to this is not about the actions of Robert E Lee but rather the protection of history. The protection of history is very important to understand who the people are both good and bad. The showing of the statue it self helps the visual side of understanding.

        104回复 10 转推 82 喜欢
      3. Txakur Gorri‏ @TxakurGorri 4月26日
        回复 @RoundTableIB

        pic.twitter.com/xbNBHB0Qbt

        4回复 5 转推 566 喜欢
      4. Round Table Decision‏ @RoundTableIB 4月26日
        回复 @TxakurGorri @AdamSerwer

        a museum would be a great place for it.

        5回复 1 转推 147 喜欢
      5. Joel Bennett‏ @Jaykul 4月26日
        回复 @RoundTableIB @TxakurGorri @AdamSerwer

        In a museum, such a statue would include a large plaque explaining how and why the post-segregation South came to build commemorative statues portraying the leaders of the secession in heroic poses. Without that plaque, it's teaching something completely different...

        10回复 42 转推 939 喜欢
      6. Round Table Decision‏ @RoundTableIB 4月26日
        回复 @Jaykul @TxakurGorri @AdamSerwer

        I can see that point of view

        4回复 1 转推 51 喜欢
      7. Big Mac Dreams‏ @McDonaldsInBed 4月26日
        回复 @RoundTableIB @Jaykul 及另外

        Most of those statues are relatively new, why put them in a museum? They aren't teaching us anything, and they have no historical significance past an artist wanting to honor the confederacy. Melt it down.

        13回复 17 转推 523 喜欢
      8. Nicht wichtig‏ @BlueNicht 4月26日
        回复 @McDonaldsInBed @RoundTableIB 及另外

        The Problem I see w/ that is that removing the statues doesn't remove the mindset, but looses the teaching opportunity that visible statue w/ Plaque has. Don't hide the sins of the past: explain them to not repeat them.

        4回复 0 转推 20 喜欢
      9. Big Mac Dreams‏ @McDonaldsInBed 4月26日
        回复 @BlueNicht @RoundTableIB 及另外

        The artist's intent wasn't to teach that the confederacy was bad, the people who funded it didn't want to teach that the confederacy was bad, casual observers don't walk over to a statue commemorating this general and walk away thinking the confederacy was bad. That's nonsense.

        4回复 6 转推 66 喜欢
      10. 另外 2 条回复
      1. 新对话
      2. Jim Handley‏ @JimHandley21 4月26日
        回复 @AdamSerwer

        You're talking about a different time. In that era States wanted a small federal Government and States to run themselves. Though slavery was an issue, this war has more to do with States Rights than anything else. Grant's own wife had slave servants, during the war.

        75回复 2 转推 21 喜欢
      3. Esther Inglis-Arkell‏ @EstherHyphen 4月26日
        回复 @JimHandley21 @AdamSerwer

        Nope. The southern states were all about Federal overreach when it came to violating other states' sovereignty by enforcing the Fugitive Slave Act or the Dred Scott decision. It was never about states' rights. What you're saying is a lie.

        6回复 16 转推 547 喜欢
      4. Margaret Burley  🐘‏ @BurleyMargaret 4月26日
        回复 @EstherHyphen @JimHandley21 @AdamSerwer

        I was taught that it was about “States rights“ in college 30 years ago. And I live in MA! I knew better at the time, but I couldn’t believe the professor was saying that. So some people are just mistaken because that’s what they were taught. And they never looked into it further.

        10回复 6 转推 133 喜欢
      5. The Airplane Nerd‏ @TheAirplaneNerd 4月26日
        回复 @BurleyMargaret @EstherHyphen 及另外

        It drives me up the wall when people say the war was about states’ rights and neglect to mention *which* states rights in particular were so important to the southern states that they were willing to fight a war over them. (It was slavery.)

        4回复 15 转推 258 喜欢
      6. Maria German‏ @marianp1968 4月26日
        回复 @TheAirplaneNerd @BurleyMargaret 及另外

        I don't get it either. We're not talking about speculation here. It's not oral or anecdotal history. They literally wrote it down - in official documents. And more than once.

        1回复 3 转推 143 喜欢
      7. Rystefn‏ @Rystefn 4月26日
        回复 @marianp1968 @TheAirplaneNerd 及另外

        Yes, the overwhelming reason for the secession was the impending spectre of abolition, but the union absolutely was NOT fighting about slavery, so saying the war was about slavery is an outright lie. The war was about denying the ability to secede.

        7回复 0 转推 15 喜欢
      8. Maria German‏ @marianp1968 4月26日
        回复 @Rystefn @TheAirplaneNerd 及另外

        OK. I wouldn't call it a lie, though. The reason they went to war was because they were not allowed to secede from the Union. Which still leaves slavery as the cause for wanting to secede in the first place.

        3回复 1 转推 79 喜欢
      9. Rystefn‏ @Rystefn 4月26日
        回复 @marianp1968 @TheAirplaneNerd 及另外

        But slavery was exactly zero percent of the reason the Union was fighting. So saying the war was about slavery is either a deliberate lie, or foundational ignorance.

        11回复 0 转推 8 喜欢
      10. 另外 5 条回复
      1. 新对话
      2. CeeCee‏ @ceg6 4月26日
        回复 @Diamond1Robert @AdamSerwer

        I've read Shelby Foote and he said the war was due to the inability to compromise. The issue of slavery couldn't have a compromise numb nuts. Also don't expect a single northerner to listen to a word you say when you refer the truth as propaganda.

        9回复 20 转推 651 喜欢
      3. Sec. Ken Barson DDS‏ @branball 4月26日
        回复 @ceg6 @Diamond1Robert @AdamSerwer

        Also Shelby Foote wasn’t a historian

        8回复 4 转推 342 喜欢
      4. CeeCee‏ @ceg6 4月26日
        回复 @branball @Diamond1Robert @AdamSerwer

        True. He also pushed lost cause fallacies. Was only mentioning his view on the war since it was brought up by the person I was responding to. We all know that the south has had many years to rewrite true history to say exactly what they want, then pass lies off as history.

        3回复 6 转推 209 喜欢
      5. Susan York‏ @mis_cue 4月26日
        回复 @ceg6 @branball 及另外

        Please *don't* feed the trolls by responding to strawman type arguments like "Shelley Foote was a historian." No. He wasn't. He was a novelist. Don't validate false ideas by arguing them as though they were true.

        3回复 1 转推 46 喜欢
      6. 另外 1 条回复

    加载似乎需要一段时间。

    Twitter 可能超载或出现了暂时故障。重试或访问 Twitter 状态以了解更多信息。

      推荐推文

      false

      • © 2019 Twitter
      • 关于
      • 帮助中心
      • 条款
      • 隐私政策
      • Cookies
      • 广告信息