Spring til indhold
Ved din brug af Twitters tjenester accepterer du vores brug af cookies. Vi og vores partnere opererer globalt og bruger cookies til blandt andet statistik, personlig tilpasning og annoncer.
  • Forside Forside Forside, aktuel side.
  • Om

Gemte søgninger

  • Fjern
  • I denne samtale
    Verificeret kontoBeskyttede tweets @
Foreslåede brugere
  • Verificeret kontoBeskyttede tweets @
  • Verificeret kontoBeskyttede tweets @
  • Sprog: Dansk
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Deutsch
    • English
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Har du en konto? Log ind
    Har du en konto?
    · Glemt din adgangskode?

    Ny på Twitter?
    Tilmeld dig
AdamSerwers profil
Adam Serwer🍝
Adam Serwer🍝
Adam Serwer 🍝
Verificeret konto
@AdamSerwer

Tweets

Adam Serwer 🍝Verificeret konto

@AdamSerwer

Staff Writer, @TheAtlantic Ideas; currently on leave while at @shorensteinctr. My jokes still aren't funny. adam@theatlantic.com adamserwer@protonmail.com

ÜT: 38.908339,-77.040837
Tilmeldt september 2008

Tweets

  • © 2019 Twitter
  • Om
  • Hjælpecenter
  • Vilkår
  • Privatlivspolitik
  • Cookies
  • Annonce-info
Afvis
Forrige
Næste

Gå til en persons profil

Gemte søgninger

  • Fjern
  • I denne samtale
    Verificeret kontoBeskyttede tweets @
Foreslåede brugere
  • Verificeret kontoBeskyttede tweets @
  • Verificeret kontoBeskyttede tweets @

Promover dette Tweet

Bloker

  • Tweet med en lokalitet

    Du kan føje lokalitetsoplysninger til dine Tweets, såsom din by eller præcise placering, fra webben og via tredjepartsapplikationer. Du kan altid slette lokalitetshistorikken for dine Tweets. Lær mere

    Dine lister

    Opret en ny liste


    Under 100 tegn, valgfri

    Privatliv

    Kopier link til tweet

    Indlejring af dette tweet

    Embed this Video

    Føj dette Tweet til dit websted ved at kopiere koden nedenfor. Lær mere

    Føj denne video til dit websted ved at kopiere koden nedenfor. Lær mere

    Hmm, der var et problem med forbindelsen til serveren.

    Ved at indlejre Twitter-indhold på dit websted eller i din app accepterer du Twitters udvikleraftale og udviklerpolitik.

    Forhåndsvisning

    Derfor ser du denne annonce

    Log ind på Twitter

    · Glemt din adgangskode?
    Har du ingen konto? Tilmeld dig »

    Tilmeld dig Twitter

    Ikke på Twitter? Tilmeld dig, find de emner du holder af, og bliv opdateret så snart noget sker.

    Tilmeld dig
    Har du en konto? Log ind »

    To-vejs (sende og modtage) tjenestenumre:

    Land Kode For kunder af
    USA 40404 (nogen)
    Canada 21212 (nogen)
    Storbritannien 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brasilien 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Irland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    Indien 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesien 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italien 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » Se sms-tjenestenumre for andre lande

    Bekræftelse

     

    Velkommen hjem!

    Denne tidslinje er der, hvor du vil bruge mest af din tid og konstant få opdateringer om det, der interesserer dig.

    Fungerer Tweets ikke for dig?

    Hold over profilbilledet og klik på Følger-knappen for at stoppe med at følge enhver konto.

    Sig en masse med en smule

    Når du ser et Tweet, du elsker, kan du trykke på hjertet — det viser personen, der skrev det, din påskønnelse.

    Spred budskabet

    Den hurtigste måde, hvorpå du kan dele en andens Tweet med dine følgere, er et Retweet. Tryk på ikonet for at sende det straks.

    Deltag i samtalen

    Tilføj dine tanker om ethvert Tweet med et svar. Find et emne, du er passioneret omkring, og hop direkte ind i samtalen.

    Få det seneste at vide

    Få øjeblikkelig indsigt i det, folk snakker om lige nu.

    Få mere af det, du elsker

    Følg flere konti for at få øjeblikkelige opdateringer om de emner, du er interesseret i.

    Opdag, hvad der sker.

    Se de nyeste samtaler om ethvert emne her og nu.

    Gå aldrig glip af et Øjeblik

    Følg de bedste historier, mens de sker.

    Adam Serwer 🍝‏Verificeret konto @AdamSerwer 26. apr.

    Robert E. Lee was a traitor, a brute and a slaver who wouldn't even trade black union soldiers taken prisoner for the lives of his own men because he saw black people as property to be owned.https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/06/the-myth-of-the-kindly-general-lee/529038/ …

    07.15 - 26. apr. 2019
    • 15.581 Retweets
    • 41.139 Likes
    • Meg NicNacNoo Christian Cri 🕊🐝🐜 Robert Sime Turney Duff little gull Lacy Johnson Robert Mcmillian
    916 svar 15.581 retweets 41.139 likes
      1. Adam Serwer 🍝‏Verificeret konto @AdamSerwer 26. apr.

        Contrary to myth, Lee did not oppose slavery or secession. He called slavery “necessary for their instruction as a race,” he enslaved free black people in his invasion of the North, and after the war, opposed black suffrage.https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/06/the-myth-of-the-kindly-general-lee/529038/ …

        143 svar 2.413 retweets 6.437 likes
        Vis denne tråd
        Tak. Twitter bruger dette til at forbedre din tidslinje. Fortryd
        Fortryd
      1. Ny samtale
      2. Round Table Decision‏ @RoundTableIB 26. apr.
        Svarer @AdamSerwer

        The counter movement to this is not about the actions of Robert E Lee but rather the protection of history. The protection of history is very important to understand who the people are both good and bad. The showing of the statue it self helps the visual side of understanding.

        104 svar 10 retweets 82 likes
      3. Txakur Gorri‏ @TxakurGorri 26. apr.
        Svarer @RoundTableIB

        pic.twitter.com/xbNBHB0Qbt

        4 svar 5 retweets 566 likes
      4. Round Table Decision‏ @RoundTableIB 26. apr.
        Svarer @TxakurGorri @AdamSerwer

        a museum would be a great place for it.

        5 svar 1 retweet 147 likes
      5. Joel Bennett‏ @Jaykul 26. apr.
        Svarer @RoundTableIB @TxakurGorri @AdamSerwer

        In a museum, such a statue would include a large plaque explaining how and why the post-segregation South came to build commemorative statues portraying the leaders of the secession in heroic poses. Without that plaque, it's teaching something completely different...

        10 svar 42 retweets 939 likes
      6. Round Table Decision‏ @RoundTableIB 26. apr.
        Svarer @Jaykul @TxakurGorri @AdamSerwer

        I can see that point of view

        4 svar 1 retweet 51 likes
      7. Big Mac Dreams‏ @McDonaldsInBed 26. apr.
        Svarer @RoundTableIB @Jaykul og

        Most of those statues are relatively new, why put them in a museum? They aren't teaching us anything, and they have no historical significance past an artist wanting to honor the confederacy. Melt it down.

        13 svar 17 retweets 523 likes
      8. Nicht wichtig‏ @BlueNicht 26. apr.
        Svarer @McDonaldsInBed @RoundTableIB og

        The Problem I see w/ that is that removing the statues doesn't remove the mindset, but looses the teaching opportunity that visible statue w/ Plaque has. Don't hide the sins of the past: explain them to not repeat them.

        4 svar 0 retweets 20 likes
      9. Big Mac Dreams‏ @McDonaldsInBed 26. apr.
        Svarer @BlueNicht @RoundTableIB og

        The artist's intent wasn't to teach that the confederacy was bad, the people who funded it didn't want to teach that the confederacy was bad, casual observers don't walk over to a statue commemorating this general and walk away thinking the confederacy was bad. That's nonsense.

        4 svar 6 retweets 66 likes
      10. 2 svar mere
      1. Ny samtale
      2. Jim Handley‏ @JimHandley21 26. apr.
        Svarer @AdamSerwer

        You're talking about a different time. In that era States wanted a small federal Government and States to run themselves. Though slavery was an issue, this war has more to do with States Rights than anything else. Grant's own wife had slave servants, during the war.

        75 svar 2 retweets 21 likes
      3. Esther Inglis-Arkell‏ @EstherHyphen 26. apr.
        Svarer @JimHandley21 @AdamSerwer

        Nope. The southern states were all about Federal overreach when it came to violating other states' sovereignty by enforcing the Fugitive Slave Act or the Dred Scott decision. It was never about states' rights. What you're saying is a lie.

        6 svar 16 retweets 547 likes
      4. Margaret Burley  🐘‏ @BurleyMargaret 26. apr.
        Svarer @EstherHyphen @JimHandley21 @AdamSerwer

        I was taught that it was about “States rights“ in college 30 years ago. And I live in MA! I knew better at the time, but I couldn’t believe the professor was saying that. So some people are just mistaken because that’s what they were taught. And they never looked into it further.

        10 svar 6 retweets 133 likes
      5. The Airplane Nerd‏ @TheAirplaneNerd 26. apr.
        Svarer @BurleyMargaret @EstherHyphen og

        It drives me up the wall when people say the war was about states’ rights and neglect to mention *which* states rights in particular were so important to the southern states that they were willing to fight a war over them. (It was slavery.)

        4 svar 15 retweets 258 likes
      6. Maria German‏ @marianp1968 26. apr.
        Svarer @TheAirplaneNerd @BurleyMargaret og

        I don't get it either. We're not talking about speculation here. It's not oral or anecdotal history. They literally wrote it down - in official documents. And more than once.

        1 svar 3 retweets 143 likes
      7. Rystefn‏ @Rystefn 26. apr.
        Svarer @marianp1968 @TheAirplaneNerd og

        Yes, the overwhelming reason for the secession was the impending spectre of abolition, but the union absolutely was NOT fighting about slavery, so saying the war was about slavery is an outright lie. The war was about denying the ability to secede.

        7 svar 0 retweets 15 likes
      8. Maria German‏ @marianp1968 26. apr.
        Svarer @Rystefn @TheAirplaneNerd og

        OK. I wouldn't call it a lie, though. The reason they went to war was because they were not allowed to secede from the Union. Which still leaves slavery as the cause for wanting to secede in the first place.

        3 svar 1 retweet 79 likes
      9. Rystefn‏ @Rystefn 26. apr.
        Svarer @marianp1968 @TheAirplaneNerd og

        But slavery was exactly zero percent of the reason the Union was fighting. So saying the war was about slavery is either a deliberate lie, or foundational ignorance.

        11 svar 0 retweets 8 likes
      10. 5 svar mere
      1. Ny samtale
      2. CeeCee‏ @ceg6 26. apr.
        Svarer @Diamond1Robert @AdamSerwer

        I've read Shelby Foote and he said the war was due to the inability to compromise. The issue of slavery couldn't have a compromise numb nuts. Also don't expect a single northerner to listen to a word you say when you refer the truth as propaganda.

        9 svar 20 retweets 651 likes
      3. Sec. Ken Barson DDS‏ @branball 26. apr.
        Svarer @ceg6 @Diamond1Robert @AdamSerwer

        Also Shelby Foote wasn’t a historian

        8 svar 4 retweets 342 likes
      4. CeeCee‏ @ceg6 26. apr.
        Svarer @branball @Diamond1Robert @AdamSerwer

        True. He also pushed lost cause fallacies. Was only mentioning his view on the war since it was brought up by the person I was responding to. We all know that the south has had many years to rewrite true history to say exactly what they want, then pass lies off as history.

        3 svar 6 retweets 209 likes
      5. Susan York‏ @mis_cue 26. apr.
        Svarer @ceg6 @branball og

        Please *don't* feed the trolls by responding to strawman type arguments like "Shelley Foote was a historian." No. He wasn't. He was a novelist. Don't validate false ideas by arguing them as though they were true.

        3 svar 1 retweet 46 likes
      6. 1 svar mere

    Indlæsning ser ud til at tage noget tid.

    Twitter kan være overbelastet eller have en midlertidig forstyrrelse. Prøv igen, eller se flere oplysninger på Twitter Status.

      Promoveret Tweet

      false

      • © 2019 Twitter
      • Om
      • Hjælpecenter
      • Vilkår
      • Privatlivspolitik
      • Cookies
      • Annonce-info