@adamliptak @hughhewitt @Harvard_Law The NYT is pouting about a ruling that loosens their stranglehold on electoral politics? I'm shocked.
Justice Kennedy @Harvard_Law on “virulent” Times editorials on Citizens United http://www.nationallawjournal.com/id=1202740827841/Justice-Anthony-Kennedy-Loathes-the-Term-Swing-Vote?back=DC&kw=Justice%20Anthony%20Kennedy%20Loathes%20the%20Term%20%27Swing%20Vote%27&cn=20151027&pt=Legal%20Times%20Afternoon%20Update&src=EMC-Email&et=editorial&bu=National%20Law%20Journal&slreturn=20150929114434 …pic.twitter.com/ImbB8nDdJk
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@adamliptak@nickconfessore Yes justice Kennedy anyone can take out an add. Corporations and the wealthy can take out thousands of adds, whyThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@adamliptak@atlblog@Harvard_Law Gee, it's almost like their opinion was principled. That's so weird.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"“I hate that term,” he said. “I get this visual image of spatial gyrations. The cases swing; I don’t.”"
@adamliptak@atlblog@Harvard_Law -
does this have something to do with what Justice Scalia called "somersaults of statutory interpretation"?
@adamliptak@atlblog@Harvard_Law
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@SCOTUSKennedy What Citizens say abt Court ignoring https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/201 … & RICO makes NYT seem tame!@adamliptak@atlblog@Harvard_LawThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.