via @monalee_kc
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
How has no one helped Randy be ready to answer this question? Single-payer proponents have an easy argument to make; it actually SAVES money
-
We HAVE to get better at explaining this in simple terms, both mathematical and moral. We already pay more than that in premiums.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
not once has CNN–or any major media–framed issue of war & bombing in dollars & cents. Ever. And they never will. Deficit trolling is a scam.
-
Randy needs to reject the premise of the Q (which he sort of tried to) & say those numbers are bullshit b/c they arehttps://twitter.com/gwarUF/status/882687872406630400 …
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
.
@JohnBerman said@CNN hadn't confirmed Urban Institute analysis but used it anyway.#CNNGoebbels#CNNGestapoThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I agree it's bad-faith concern trolling, but what specifically about the price tag estimate is wrong? Urban is usually good at this stuff
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
He should have fought back on the number. Disgusting how blatantly subservient CNN are to their healthcare advertisers.
-
He's not supposed to fight back-He is simply there to prevent
@CathyMyersWI from winning primary because she truly does support#SinglePayer - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
@Ironstache needed to fact-check this BS live. $32T assumes no change in cost. Elim insurance/admin waste & pharma profits = much cheaper HC -
Even if we were spending the same amount we'd be covering millions more people.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.