The odd thing to me about this view of marriage as a welfare scheme for socially awkward males is how it completely ignores the material benefits marriage confers on women
-
Show this thread
-
In terms of physical security, social status and transfer of wealth and income.
3 replies 0 retweets 4 likesShow this thread -
The problem with allowing rich feminists to frame marriage as some patriarchal conspiracy is that they're doing away with an institution (particularly at the lower ends of the socioeconomic spectrum) that confers vastly more material benefits to women than men.
2 replies 5 retweets 22 likesShow this thread -
In the meantime, they're still getting married themselves in the most bourgeois way possible:https://mobile.nytimes.com/2009/10/18/fashion/weddings/18VOWS.html …
2 replies 1 retweet 7 likesShow this thread
What's always important to understand about feminism is that it's about ratcheting up the social authority of the top 10% of females at the expensive of the material well being of the bottom 90%
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.