It's naive to suggest that a dramatic show of force like killing a bunch of people isn't required at times. In certain cases it saves lives long term by demonstrating the state's willingness to be ruthless
I guess one can argue that the status quo is sustainable long term as a sort of permanent colonial status but I don't see how it is given the right keeps expanding settlements
-
-
It doesn't seem possible to stably govern a hostile population when your right flank keeps treating it as a settler colony.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
I guess the less deranged elements on the right see the settlements as leverage for an eventual population/land transfer
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.