yes, but there's no good reason why he shouldn't be allowed to be moved there other than that the NHS says so
Of course it is. It's about what rights the state can take away from the parents of a terminally ill minor. Specifically the right to decide how to act in his best interest as they see fit.
-
-
When did I argue that parents have absolute rights over their child? News to me that parents can murder their children with no consequences. However, it's a strawman to argue that the absence of absolute rights implies the absence of all rights
-
I find it hard to believe you think that parents have no rights over their child such as the right to choose where to educate their child or to discipline them for bad behavior or to make medical decisions on behalf of their child.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Agreed. To me, parental rights are really their "right" to be the ones responsible for performing certain duties. The fact that they are duties doesn't mean the state should be able to coopt them.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.