Because they've decided not to confirm Kavanaugh.https://twitter.com/charlescwcooke/status/1045375568655601664 …
-
-
Replying to @michaelbd
My god...can you not picture any woman you know in her shoes? She was utterly believable and has no motive to lie (in contrast to Kavanaugh). The key witness wasn’t even required to testify! Have you said a word about that?
2 replies 1 retweet 15 likes -
-
Replying to @michaelbd @yeselson
When they dump Kavanaugh, I want a full FBI investigation.
4 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @michaelbd
Ok, fair enough. But do you think, as an obvious matter of fair process, that Judge should have been subpoenaed, in fairness to both parties?
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @yeselson
He submitted a statement for which he can be prosecuted if it is proved false.
9 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @michaelbd @yeselson
Doesn't it seem, since he's the link between all these characters (including perhaps the unnamed other guy), that there might be useful questions to ask him under oath?
4 replies 1 retweet 43 likes -
Replying to @DouthatNYT @yeselson
Want the rest of the partygoers under oath as well?
6 replies 0 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @michaelbd @yeselson
Sure. Not least because I think any convincing defense of Kavanaugh has to establish more about the social context of this incident.
6 replies 1 retweet 17 likes -
From the perspective of the non-Ford "witnesses" (per Ford), is there even a particular incident to interrogate? No date or location proffered and denials from all but Ford of a gathering of the sort leaves you without a defined incident around which there could be a context, no?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Ross wants Judge to provide context to an incident he denies ever happened! Seems simple enough
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.