Being a 21st century sociologist is pathologizing parental love at book length and getting a good tenure track job and adoring interviews with the Atlantic for ithttps://twitter.com/jpinsk/status/1036975218701545472 …
-
-
That may be true in general, but the NYC Schools Chancellor still faces no resistance from the press when he calls parents racist because they want to send their kid to a 40% white school instead of a 5% white school.https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/03/nyregion/nyc-chancellor-school-segregation.html?smid=tw-nytimes&smtyp=cur …
-
That's not a revealed preference though. He'll receive pushback when he actually tries to put that into action.
-
He was humiliating, with media help, specific parents who showed up at a district meeting to argue against merging their (minority white) school with (microminority white & higher poverty)schools. this kind of thing increases real costs of being a parent in an urban school system
-
The journo class is happy to see *other* white families suffer, it's only when it happens to their own that they push back. And never publicly either, they keep spewing the same socjus nonsense.
-
I think the big lesson here is that racism and segregation are good things. Seriously. Segregation saves white children from having to deal with the dysfunction of black children. The whole thing about good schools and the change of neighborhoods of white families involves around
-
that basic fact. When legal segregation ended, whites made the right decision to spare their children from black dysfunction whenever possible. And why do I say it's right? Because it seems pretty immoral for me not to prioritize your kids.
-
But others have a different moral system, one that involves self-sacrifice on the altar of a ridiculous ideology.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.