It's laughable that anyone would think civic nationalism in a polity without an ethnic supermajority would be a meaningful concept.
I see religion based imperialism as distinct from secular civic nationalism
-
-
Though by the 19th century shared identification with the Hapsburg dynasty and its institutions was more important for the state culture than shared Catholicism (especially given sustained loyalty of many non-Catholics minorities - Galician Orthodox, Jews, Saxon Protestants, etc)
-
civic nationalism with a religious supermajority but not an ethnic supermajority might be the us circa 1950 or so, depending how you define your terms
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.