I don't think you can base a morality on science. Whatever science he cites is there for decoration.
You're asking for evidence that cultivating good behavior that requires a certain amount of effort is good for people?
-
-
first of all, i'm asking for evidence that the various self-help suggestions peterson gives are good. then i'd like evidence that individuals who are less able to do these good things benefit more from doing them than those people for whom the actions come naturally.
-
It would be idiotic to come up with an evidence based theory of morality based on social psych research given that hardly anything ever replicates. My point is that you're demanding evidence for the fundamentals of nearly all virtue ethics with the implication that anyone who
-
advocates any sort of cultivation of virtue to people of various levels of ability is, by definition, a charlatan. That's nonsensical.
-
i didn't say anything about peterson being a charlatan. he prolly believes what he says. i'm saying that anyone who gives blanket advice to all is simply giving bad advice, because human biodiversity.
-
Yeah, you're arguing that cultivating virtue is pointless because everything is genetically determined. So messy people should just not bother cleaning up and parents shouldn't discipline their children. This is obviously much more logical than Peterson's outlandish advice.
-
Oh, and everyone should try and watch as much porn as possible to lower rape rates.
-
HbdChick didn't i did .Nice strawman. Who said that?
-
you argued that Peterson telling people to not watch porn is an example of his dangerous advice?
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.